comScore
Uncategorized Friday, February 3rd 2012 at 11:46 am

Anonymous Publishes Stolen FBI Conference Call

During this recent spell of Internet-endangering-legislation craziness, everyone’s favorite loosely organized group of Guy Fawkes-mask-wearing hackers, Anonymous, has been relatively quiet aside from some (alleged) empty threats thrown Sony’s way and a flurry of DDOS attacks following the MegaUpload takedown. Now, Anonymous has kicked it up a notch and leaked the spoils of one of their more impressive hacks to date: Audio of a conference call between the FBI and the Scotland Yard.

As with anything Anonymous, your first instinct should be to question authenticity, whether it be the authenticity of a threat, a leak, or in this case a 16 minute audio file. This is real, however, as the FBI has confirmed that the call was “was intended for law enforcement officers only and was illegally obtained,” as well as the fact that “[a] criminal investigation is under way to identify and hold accountable those responsible.”

It’s unknown exactly how Anonymous managed to get their hands on this audio, something which they’ve naturally been gloating about on Twitter. Anonymous has released email lists and other dumps of network credentials in the past, but their meat-and-potatoes is generally DDOS attacks, so the interception of this law enforcement communication is a pretty big catch for the hackers, and a pretty big embarrassment for the agencies involved.

The conversation pertains to trying to track down members of Anonymous, so the irony that Anonymous was listening in — and may have been listening in for for weeks now — is something unlikely to be lost on the FBI and Scotland Yard alike. More than any other Anonymous activity before, this seems to be a direct slap in the face to law enforcement. It’s worth noting, however, that whoever leaked the audio bleeped out some of the hacker’s names ostensibly to protect their identities, which suggests that the agents in the recording are, in fact, barking up the right tree. Still, that’s a small victory to be had when one of your private conversations has been published and the security of all your discussions has been thrown into question. It’ll be interesting to see if this is a harbinger of increased, intensified Anonymous action in the days to come.

Listen to the conference call here, while it lasts.

(via The Next Web)

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • http://profiles.google.com/joint.striker joint striker

    LMAO

  • Jackbondnj16

    I hope they find the ***holes responsible and punish them severely.

  • er0n

    Hopes and dreams… let’s not forget who we’re talking about… anonymous hackers versus Pentagon’s McDonalds enthusiasts, these hackers won’t get caugth becasue it seems they’re always one step ahead

  • Zephyrkinetic

     Who, the FBI?

  • Anonymous

    Hahaha u idiots dont know wat we have instore next

  • Jackbondnj16

    Lol. Idiots. It’s ironic because you’re so dumb you can’t even spell.

  • Seán

    If the pentagon are abel to have hi tech security there is alwase a way past it wen theres a will theres a way theres alwase a key to a door to open all secrets behind it 
    Annonimus are right to do what they do nothing should be hiddin from the public xD

  • http://MyShocker.com Nudo

    indeed, what are they hiding from us anyways? The people are their strongest weapon, or are we actually their greatest enemy in their eyes?

  • Jackbondnj16

    These secrets are kept so that other countries don’t use them to take advantage of us.

    They keep secrets from us citizens because we may either sell the secrets to other countries, or, like idiots, publish them on the internet for anyone to see. They can’t trust us with sensitive information.

    So no. Anonymous is not right to do what they do. They’re putting themselves and us in danger and damaging our country and its competitive edge because they are shortsighted and uneducated.

    Furthermore, citizens don’t understand all the goings on of government affairs because again, they’re not educated for such purposes. Some things may be kept secret because citizens will make hasty assumptions and react inappropriately to certain news.

  • http://MyShocker.com Nudo

    If you think the government should have more power than the people, you’re talking to the wrong guy.

  • Jackbondnj16

    (In response to your latest comment) Oh, no. I’m against big government, but think of it like this. we’re not hiring these people to rule over us or keep order within our own borders. These people intend to keep us safe from those who would want to harm us from outside our borders. They’re trained tacticians, and we’re not. Therefore, I would prefer to let them do their job and us not interfere. And the government assists them by making laws that help them do their job without our interference. Even if the government were smaller, I would vote to allow silent operations so as to not announce every move we ever make to the targets of said operation. That way some justice can actually get done, you see?

  • Twtchr44

    SPELLING:
    able
    always
    when
    anonymous
    hidden

    GRAMMAR:
    pentagon IS able
    have HIGH tech

    also, use punctuation, such as periods, commas, and apostrophes…

  • Anonymoussupport

    Are you seriously that stupid that you would rather not hear what the FBI is discussing? I’m assuming you’re the same dumb-fuck that watches CNN news and believes everything you hear. You probably voted for Bush, also. How could you possible hope they punish Anonymous? Why? For one-upping wiki-leaks? 

  • Sdhjjhl

    Women are sometimes fragile, want a
    real-man to protect you? Join in   

    —uniformedkiss*c’o’m–, here you will meet lots
    of servicemen and find friendship, love, romance, marriage or even more with those
    armed forces, police, navy, security, medical, ambulance, prison, air crew and
    fire fighters! You will not regret for dating with military personnel. Just sign
    up and nothing will lose if you don’t like it. Thanks….

  • Sam

    wow so far it seems really boring.. I was expecting something like them wanting to use swat teams, or spy equipment and other cool shit.. so far it seems like two normal guys discussing their day and really mundane details that they learned about a few anonymous members…. 

  • Sam

    wow so far it seems really boring.. I was expecting something like them wanting to use swat teams, or spy equipment and other cool shit.. so far it seems like two normal guys discussing their day and really mundane details that they learned about a few anonymous members…. 

  • justananon

    the assholes responsible for hacking?
    you corrupt fuck, you can get of the internet now.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6NVQXKGM4GSM6RZ7ZW3BQ2D73I Kim

    My friend just met a chocolate man on Blackwhitem‘eet.COMit’s where for men and women looking for interracial’ship for a fabulous lifestyle
    It’s a nice place for black white sing’les, to interact with each other…no bounds or extremes in front of true love.

  • Dxfhhjg

    Why we recommend you the man in military?
    The reason is simple: They are not only dependable, but also romantic. They are
    brave and strong but also warm in heart. Now it’s a new
    year, find your strong and warm arms for a new beginning at —- uniformedkiss*c’o’m
    —- 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FNHZW3D3AE7C6DEVQFB2O4FLNM Sleepy

    Unfortunately no one ever reprimands the Feds. J. Edgar Hoover, there’s a man who should have gotten his!

  • INFIDELuxe

    There would be good reason to bleep the names, even if the bleeped names were dead wrong. For one, Anon may not even know the names of certain members, so it would be wise to play it safe. Even if the names were known to be incorrect, it would be considerate to keep the names out of the public to prevent innocents from being unduly persecuted by arm chair investigators. It does not suggest the FBI were on the right track.