Apple v. Samsung: Jury Rules Samsung Owes $1.049 Billion

The jury of the Apple v. Samsung copyright trial has made their decision, and it was a bloodbath. After a surprisingly short deliberation period yesterday, the nine-member jury ruled that Samsung had infringed on every one of Apple’s patents on nearly every device in question. Samsung has been ordered to pay Apple a whopping $1.049 billion for basing many of their phones off the iPhone’s design as well as copying many of Apple’s core features for touch-based designs.

Recommended Videos

Despite Samsung’s best efforts, the jury considered all of Apple’s patents, including those for touch-gestures like “tap-to-zoom” functionality and two-finger swiping gestures, to be legitimate. Many of the features in question have become industry standards, and it looks like Apple may now have the ammo to sue every major smartphone manufacturer out there over certain functions.

Though Apple is the undeniable winner of the trial, the jury didn’t rule in their favor on everything. They upheld Samsung’s own utility patents, which Apple asserted were invalid, and ruled that Samsung had not violated any antitrust laws or Universal Mobile Telecommunications System, or UMTS, agreements. It saved them some money, but it still seems like the smallest possible consolation prize.

More importantly, Apple’s non-patented design claims regarding the iPad and iPhone, like certain design features like the configuration of icons in their menu screen, and the appearance of the physical devices were not deemed “famous” or “protectable.” While the decision didn’t directly help Samsung all that much, the acknowledgement that certain aspects of tablet design have become standardized may be what keeps Android and Windows 8 tablets on the market.

Even so, Samsung still managed to escape the worst possible outcome. The total owed is less than half of what Apple wanted: The victorious iPhone-makers initially requested $2.5 billion for all the “trouble” Samsung caused.

(via The Verge, image credit via Gilly Berlin)

Relevant to Your Interests

 


The Mary Sue is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more
related content
Read Article ‘Mamma Mia!’ Star Sara Poyzer Says a BBC Production Replaced Her With AI
Sara Poyzer performs at the Magic at the Musicals event in 2019
Read Article In Moment of Unbelievable Irony, Midjourney Accuses Stability AI of Image Theft
Spider-Man pointing at another Spider-Man, who is pointing back.
Read Article Elon Musk May Be the Lesser of Two Evils in This Legal Battle With OpenAI
Elon Musk at the 2022 Met Gala
Read Article A.I. Scammers Are Impersonating Real Authors to Sell Fake Books
A robotic hand holds a pencil.
Read Article Sexist Trolls Drive Away Twitch’s Top Female Streamer After 10 Years
Imane "Pokimane" Anys at the 2023 Green Carpet Fashion Awards
Related Content
Read Article ‘Mamma Mia!’ Star Sara Poyzer Says a BBC Production Replaced Her With AI
Sara Poyzer performs at the Magic at the Musicals event in 2019
Read Article In Moment of Unbelievable Irony, Midjourney Accuses Stability AI of Image Theft
Spider-Man pointing at another Spider-Man, who is pointing back.
Read Article Elon Musk May Be the Lesser of Two Evils in This Legal Battle With OpenAI
Elon Musk at the 2022 Met Gala
Read Article A.I. Scammers Are Impersonating Real Authors to Sell Fake Books
A robotic hand holds a pencil.
Read Article Sexist Trolls Drive Away Twitch’s Top Female Streamer After 10 Years
Imane "Pokimane" Anys at the 2023 Green Carpet Fashion Awards