comScore
Uncategorized Sunday, September 30th 2012 at 2:00 pm

Asteroid Dust Cloud May be Earth’s Best Hope Against Global Warming

Environmentalists want people to reduce their carbon footprints, compost, and do absolutely anything that might be able to reduce the effects of global warming. I’m not saying the environment isn’t important, but the battle against convenience will inevitably be a losing one. Luckily for us, scientists from Scotland may have found a way to prevent the sun from melting us alive without asking the average person to stop driving their car. Researchers at the University of Strathclyde think the best way to reduce the sun’s impact on the planet is to block some of its rays with a giant cloud of asteroid dust.

Technically, the plan falls under the umbrella of Geoengineering, where scientists would attempt artificially altering the planet’s temperature using one of a handful of grand procedures for fixing the planet’s climate problems. Some of these projects involve strengthening the atmosphere, others suggest building a series of mirrors to deflect some of the sun’s heat back into space. Realistically, the asteroid dust technique would simply absorb some of the energy directed at the Earth, which would counter-balance the increased amount of heat passing through our atmosphere.

So how do we do it? Researchers suggest we equip nearby asteroid orbiting the earth with a “mass driver”, which would fling the rock’s debris away from it. The device would both increase the asteroid’s orbital speed, and serve as the primary device for generating the dust shield. They even have a specific asteroid in mind. 1036 Ganymed, the largest near-Earth asteroid, could create a dust field that would absorb 6.58 percent of earthbound solar radiation.

On the other hand, the field would weigh about 11-million-billion tons, which sounds like enough to kill all life on Earth. That’s just my guesstimate, though.

Of course, even if the asteroid cloud could work, the team working on the project doesn’t think people should give up on promoting a greener lifestyle:

“I would like to make it clear that I would never suggest geoengineering in place of reducing our carbon emissions,” said Russel Bewick, space scientist at the University of Strathclyde. ”We can buy time to find a lasting solution to combat Earth’s climate change. The dust cloud is not a permanent cure, but it could offset the effects of climate change for a given time to allow slow-acting measures like carbon capture to take effect.”

In the end, the question is whether or not reducing solar radiation is worth the risk. There’s no way to test whether or not the asteroid dust shield would work. We’re either going to do it or we aren’t. Personally, I’m for it: I just looked out my window and saw guy throw a cheeseburger wrapper next to a garbage can, so I think we’re going to need a little more time to get our act together.

(via Live Science, Image Credit Charlotte Lücking via Live Science)

Relevant to Your Interests

Filed Under |
  • winterd

    Isn’t that what happened in Highlander 2?

  • Jack Bond

    Yeah. Block the sun, create global cooling. THEN the climate will start to become unstable. The genius who thought this up may be responsible for the extinction of humanity.

  • Houston Jones

    Truly. What about once we do get carbon emissions under control (or we essentially run out and quit using fossils on a massive scale). It wouldn’t seem like a gigantic outer space dust cloud would be easy to clean up. Perhaps they’ve also invented the biggest leafblower in the galaxy too…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeremy-David-Thomson/1404770597 Jeremy David Thomson

    I was going to say that’s the dumbest idea ever. The asteroid dust will form a ring around the earth, with minimal shading effect at the hottest part of the year and day. Then I read the linked article where it states they’d put the asteroid at the L1 lagrange point, this librartion point is between the earth and the sun and the dust cloud would be held in place by the asteroids gravity.
    Okay, now that sounds resonable.

  • Idlethoughts

    If you factor coal reserves into the picture it seems unlikely we within the next half century, so it looks like we’re going to have to be big boys about this and cut down on using them on our own acord.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Adam-Kyle/791320323 Adam Kyle

    Nothing bad could possible happen …

  • Jack Bond

    Or don’t make any unnecessary changes to the way you’re living.

  • http://twitter.com/rayban5016 Ray O.

    Idiots. Just watched a 2 hour show on the Discovery channel last night about NOAA scientists who say they have found evidence of real, life mermaids. But the government is covering it up. And we humans have caused the near extinction of these peaceful creatures. Really??? These are the same whack job scientist promoting global warming. Man made global warming is a hoax, supported by politicians who supply grant money to scientist who then in turn give the politicians the data that they want and need so they can make policy to control more and more of our lives. There is good science and bad science. I would avoid any science that has a political solution. They don’t typically end well.