comScore
Space Thursday, January 3rd 2013 at 8:39 am

NASA Reportedly Considering Proposal to Give the Moon a Smaller Moon of Its Own

One of 2012′s oddest and most interesting ideas in space exploration may be getting a renewed lease on life in 2013. According to New Scientist, NASA is “mulling over” a proposal by researchers at the Keck Institute for Space Studies (KISS) to give the moon a moon of its own. The idea, which would see NASA snag an asteroid from deeper in space and tow it back to the moon, where it would take up orbit around the Earth’s only natural satellite, has apparently made it far enough to be considered for funding in NASA’s next round of budgeting, and all we can say is “Oh, my yes.”

You can take a look at the full study, which was first published last April, here, but here are the broad strokes. KISS researchers envision a slow, steady spacecraft powered by solar ions — a sort of spacefaring tugboat that would rendezvous with a small asteroid, probably about 7 meters wide. After doing some initial study of the asteroid, the craft would deploy a giant bag around the space rock — yes, you read that right — and then start on a course back toward the moon. The last leg of that trip would take between six and ten years, which may seem like a long time, but we’d like to see how fast you move dragging 20 feet of boulder through the depths of space.

Researchers expect the program would run about $2.6 billion dollars all told, a price tag that is on par with the Curiosity Rover, and one that would leave the moon with a sidekick afterward. Frankly, if that’s not money well spent, we don’t know what is — especially considering the plan could potentially provide a jump start for industries like asteroid mining. So maybe a few of the VCs who are so into that field would be willing to kick in a couple bucks on the deal? Just thinking out loud here.

As for exactly how seriously is NASA “mulling” this plan…well, we’ll kind of believe it when we see it. It’s not that we don’t want NASA to go retrieve an asteroid from the depths of space, tow it back to our neck of the woods, and give it to the moon as a pet. For the record we think that is a fantastic idea for science and also probably a reasonably successful children’s book.

We’ve reached out to the space agency for clarification, and will update if the details of this story become more clear any time soon.

(via New Scientist)

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1022351409 Julian Daniel Monakian

    death star ftw!

  • http://www.facebook.com/tyler.defiler Tyler Defiler Poppler

    Hmmm asteroid mining? I see where this is going…….Dead Space anyone?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bruce-E-Screws-Jr/5200506 Bruce E. Screws Jr.

    It sounds like a neat idea, but I would much rather it be funded by VOLUNTARY donations.

  • http://www.facebook.com/themediamaven Kevin Birnbaum

    The idea of private industry mining the last place for humanity to get raw materials is horrifying.

  • Jack Bond

    Bruce brings up a good point… It’d be crazy awesome to have a minimoon to look at in the night sky, but I’d rather reserve taxpayer money for things taxpayer money was intended for… like welfare and slush funds and deviously crafted bailouts and subsidies for luxury industries among other things.

  • Evan Dickinson

    What on earth? You don’t like having resources provided to you at low cost?

    Do you have any idea how many asteroids moons and planets there are to mine? By the time we are out of resources in this system we will have already moved out to other systems. That time will be at least thousands of years in the future.

  • Idlethoughts

    Yeah, why waste tax payer money on space travel instead it could be like the time we invented velcro and went to the moon by accident. Oh wait.

  • Idlethoughts

    I would like to point out that not once did the source article mention the idea of commercial asteroid mining, for now we’re just trying to study it.

  • Anonymous

    No, no: what NASA and possible other countries should do is set off numerous thermonuclear bombs on the FAR side of the moon at exactly the time when it’s closest to Earth so it won’t venture away at about a meter a year. We need the moon to be nearby so the Earth keeps its current incline. Also, it would make a great movie.

  • CalebJett

    That’s no moon…

  • Jack Bond

    Please tell me what we could gain from spending countless dollars in tax payer money and making a rock spin around the moon. More importantly, explain to me how this directly benefits our citizens in their day-to-day lives, because taxes are not for frivolous projects. Taxes are for absolute necessities.

  • ki1cr

    What a STUPID idea!!!

  • http://www.tiny-threads.com Steve

    If this worked, wouldn’t it may a viable option for space travel? Think about it. Hollow it out and use the same tow craft to take us to Mars. Two birds with one 2.6 billion dollar stone!