How to Complain to the Government About the AT&T-T-Mobile Merger

So what’s the alternative?

VZW doesn’t want Tmobile.
Tmo customers want to merge with Sprint equally as much as they’d want to merge w/ At&t.
Deutsche Telekom doesn’t want Tmo, obviously.
So what… give it away to some lesser, regional carrier?
Let it die completely and just dump all the current customers?
Keep running a business you don’t want to run anymore?

No matter what the outcome here, current Tmo customers are going to have to face change and that change can either be ‘Tolerable’, ‘Bad’ or ‘Bloody Butt-Tearing Painful’.

By selling Tmo, DT is basically telling the world they can’t sustain this company as the #4 carrier in the U.S. anymore. Force DT to hold onto to it, and all I can imagine is rising costs which is going to drive people to the other carriers anyway.

Nothing stays the same forever… gonna see what happens with this before getting all up in arms.

Rising costs are what we T-mobile customers would face under AT&T, and we’d have one fewer option to choose from. AT&T and Verizon have been reducing how much service you get for your money, their plans are getting more draconian, and they’re relying on gadget geeks ‘needing’ the latest Android or Apple product to peddle their crappy service for thousands of dollars per year.

The reason we don’t want to merge with Sprint is that they’re a poorly-run company that can’t seem to figure out how to run a railroad.

Rising costs are what we T-mobile customers would face under AT&T, and we’d have one fewer option to choose from. AT&T and Verizon have been reducing how much service you get for your money, their plans are getting more draconian, and they’re relying on gadget geeks ‘needing’ the latest Android or Apple product to peddle their crappy service for thousands of dollars per year.

The reason we don’t want to merge with Sprint is that they’re a poorly-run company that can’t seem to figure out how to run a railroad.

Rising costs are what we T-mobile customers would face under AT&T, and we’d have one fewer option to choose from. AT&T and Verizon have been reducing how much service you get for your money, their plans are getting more draconian, and they’re relying on gadget geeks ‘needing’ the latest Android or Apple product to peddle their crappy service for thousands of dollars per year.

The reason we don’t want to merge with Sprint is that they’re a poorly-run company that can’t seem to figure out how to run a railroad.

Thank goodness Sprint isn’t in the railroad business.

Verizon still has the best network hands down.

Tmo treated me like crap when I had them. There is a reason they are the cheapest.

If you want stable secure and cutting edge, VZW. If you want value cutting edge and stable at a good price, Sprint.

If you like to throw your money away on clever advertising and a shoddy network go with either of the GSM carriers. They have the cheapest to install and maintain cell sites in the industry and can’t create infrastructure for crap.

Regardless of the carrier you look at, someone has had issues with their service in one way or another. I dropped sprint because the one time I had an emergency and needed their service, I had none. I dropped at&t because of their crap service and bad customer service, verizon may suposedly be the best, but their prices are outlandish, and their customer service is good only if you’re a new customer.

Tmo is the only one I’ve had no issues with so far, and I love the freedom of having the sim card. sim card is half the reason I’m with them. If I want to go on a bike ride, throw the sim card in an older slide phone that if it gets ruined a bit i dont care, have a business meeting, throw the sim card in a 4g phone that has internet, my calendar, etc.

If at&t does acquire tmo they even said that all tmo customers would have to replace their phones because they still use slightly different technology.

why encourage a monopoly ?

I am a T-mobile customer. I have a smart phone which I purchased at full price. I want a smart phone because of the things I can do with a smart phone without having data. I don’t want data, and I don’t want to pay for a service that I don’t want. T-mobile allows me, if I paid full price for my phone, to have the service without data.

AT&T and Verizon force data on you even if you won a the smart phone at full price and do not want data. This is no different than if you order a Shrimp dinner at a restaurant and you are told that you must also order a steak dinner if you want the shrimp dinner. This is called “tying” and is specifically prohibited under the Clayton Anti-Trust Act.

I am happy that T-mobile acts within the law regarding the tying provisions of the Clayton Act. I don’t want to move to a carrier that forces me to have data service when all I want is phone service!

I AM REALLY DISGUSTE WITH THE WAY T-MOBILE IS FORCING ME INTO TWO PLUS TWO MORE YEARS OF WHAT HAS BECOME…………..LOSY LOUSY SERVICE !!!

LOUSYLOUSYLOUSY