comScore
Uncategorized Wednesday, August 22nd 2012 at 12:03 pm

New Theory Sees Big Bang Like Change From Liquid to Solid

Physicists at the University of Melbourne have proposed a new way of looking at the origins of our universe, suggesting that everything that is came not from a Big Bang, but a Big Chill. The team, led by researcher James Quach, suggests that rather than a highly compressed universe exploding outwards in a huge release of energy, the universe as we know it instead coalesced from amorphous energy into its current crystallized form, like water freezing into ice.

In a paper published this month in the journal Physical Review D, Quach’s team theorizes that rather than a compressed point of matter, the pre-universe was a roiling, super hot soup of energy. Once that soup cooled off sufficiently — about 13.7 billion years ago, give or take — it solidified and crystallized, giving us the three dimensions of space and one dimension of time that we’ve all been brought up with.

Crystallization is an imperfect process, though, a fact that could offer the team a chance to test their theory. Just as cracks can appear in an ice cube or flaws crop up in a diamond, the newly solidified universe would contain regions where the crystallization process didn’t take.

These regions would be marked by light and other cosmic particles reflecting off of them or travelling around them, as the laws of nature could be changed in areas that never fully crystallized into the stuff of the universe that we all know and love. The next step in research for the team is to go in search of these flawed areas while also hoping that no terrors from beyond space-time come bounding out of them — a real concern any time one goes searching for broken parts of the ancient universe.

(via space.com, image courtesy of NASA)

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • Jessica Russo

    Those uncrystallized area are probably black holes or worm holes. If we are actually crystallizing, the worm hole time travel will not happen? Those worm hole tunnels are not short cut anymore. 

  • Anonymous

     Darn, would that make SG1 not possible. 

  • Jack Bond

    This will be amusing.

    Because matter totally existed before matter existed. The scientific method can suck it!

  • Cockpol

    If ice is pure and homogenius it dus not crac

  • doc

    An energy soup is not matter.

    Even the big bang theory says that there has to have been energy before there was matter, space and time.

    What I don’t get is where space and time fit into this crystalization theory. Does that mean that they always existed and never had a beginning? Where does the expansion of the universe come from then?

  • Jack Bond

    Alright. Replace the word matter with “energy soup” if it’s that big a deal to you. The meaning is unchanged.

  • doc

    Yes it is. Energy=Matter.

    So energy crystalizes into matter.Desn’t hurt the scientific method at all, as long as the math checks out, which apparently it does.

  • doc

    Good thing the universe isn’t pure and homogenous then. 

  • Jack Bond

    I’d like to see math that proves either matter or energy or both just existed out of nowhere.

  • Dr Coene

    Yeah?

    Let me guess. You find that explanation perfectly acceptable for God, but not for matter or energy.

    Yawn.

  • Jack Bond

    Good guess.

    Wrong guess, but good nonetheless.

    But at least God’s existence doesn’t have to follow the laws of nature by definition. I.e. his existence doesn’t break his own rules like the big bang does.

  • doc

    Neither the Big Bang Theory nor this Crystalization-Hypothesis describe the time before the existence of matter, they are not supposed to.

    They simply describe what the beginning of our current universe roughly looks like “from here”, extrapolated via the information we have at our disposal to date.

    We cannot see to “the other side”, the time before this supposed creation-event, because our current data isn’t sufficient yet. Every scientist will gladly admit that.

    We will go there once we have accumulated enough evidence to support a new theory but for now we interprete the stuff we know instead of laying down sucking our thumbs or screaming “god did it”.

  • Jack Bond

    Well there only seems to be one actual explanation of why the “creation event” happened. You don’t have to believe it, but unless you have something better, you shouldn’t bash people who believe the only explanation available.

  • doc

    Believe it or not, I can actually live with that. I have no problem with people using god as a framework, filling the gaps of human understanding. The existence of a higher being guiding the fates of the universe isn’t impossible, merely rather unlikely in light of recent scientific insights.

    What I can’t live with is people holding on to their untenable beliefs in total ignorance of overwhelming, logically and scientifically sound evidence.
    What I also can’t live with is people persistently trying to drag science in the dirt as if it was an enemy worth fighting.

    It seems to me like a sign of desperation and fills me with pity and no small amount of compassion. I don’t experience this compassion because Jesus taught me but because I’m human and the mirror neurons in my brain give me the capability to comprehend your standpoint.

  • Jack Bond

    Some people can’t live with people holding on to their eternal loyalty to every word they hear from the science community in ignorance of answers the Bible already gives that are already proven.

    Mind you, I’m not one of those people, but I’m just providing an alternate viewpoint.

    The point is, people think of you the same way you think of them. It’s all about perspective. Both think they’re equally correct, and both are backed by valid scientific evidences. Furthermore, both sides are full of major flaws and fudged science. So the way I see it, neither side really has any right to be so disgusted at the other side. (Like Bill Nye in his recent little public announcement)

  • Haizoom

    The Quran says:

    And He it is Who has created the heavens and the earth in six Days and His Throne was on the water, that He might try you, which of you is the best in deeds. But if you were to say to them: “You shall indeed be raised
    up after death,” those who disbelieve would be sure to say, “This is
    nothing but obvious magic.”[Chapter 11, verse 7]

    “Have not those who disbelieve known that the heavens and the earth were joined together as one united piece, then We parted them? And We have made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?” [Chapter 21, verse 30]

  • doc

    The most beautiful thing about science is, that there is no eternal loyalty whatsoever, there are no authorities whose word is considered law, at least by design, there shouldn’t be.
    Nothing is writ in stone, everything is in flux, every theory must be supported by evidence, that is subject to scrutiny by EVERYONE. If new evidence disproves a theory, textbooks will have to be rewritten, new conclusions will have to be drawn. Every 20-50 years or so the scientific community is revolutionized again by a new insight. There is only one way: forward.

    Many religious people find this unsettling, people in general don’t like change, people want things to stay the same, people want safety, stability.

    However it is this stubborn holding on to dogmas that holds us back on a grand scale, yet doesn’t really offer any form of safety.

    On the contrary, even according to evolution the capability to be flexible and adapt to changes in the enviroment quickly are among the most important feats a species can have. And as you undoubtedly realise, the world has changed quite a bit

    I wouldn’t have any problems at all with organized religions, were it not for their persistent attempts to impose their will on every human being and crush every sign of progress.

    Furthermore I can’t help but wonder what those answers are, you referred to in the beginning, given by the bible. And more importantly how are they proven? For as far as I can tell, the majority of concrete “answers” given have either been disproven by scientific evidence or had no basis in reality and thus were impossible to prove in the terms implied by the Bible.
    Don’t get me wrong I actually consider myself agnostic, but a single book written by over a dozen different people and evidently repeatedly edited and restructured over the centuries simply isn’t sufficient evidence.

  • doc

    Sorry to disappoint but scientists don’t find mataphors particularly impresive…

  • Ming FAN

    It’s a reasonable explanation of why there’s should be a Big Bang…briliant idea..

  • Slarty,

    E does not = Mc2 where black holes are concerned.
    This is primarily due to the simple lack of T.

    As far as God is concerned why restrict yourself to just one?
    eventually you will discover there are billions to choose from.

  • HeywoodJ

    Are you kidding? There are hundreds of explanations of creation, all conflicting, but all involving magic. Yes, it’s fine to bash anything that involves magic because adults shouldn’t need magic.

  • Jack Bond

    What exactly qualifies as magic? Something that is beyond the rules of nature, otherwise known as supernatural?

    How do you explain the generation of matter, energy, and the laws of nature themselves? I don’t think the laws of nature were able to generate themselves by their own rules, so that must have been supernatural. Scientists who disbelieve the Bible can’t work in the realm of the supernatural, so they have no explanation. You can’t bash the supernatural just because it doesn’t make sense, ESPECIALLY if you don’t have a better explanation.

  • http://www.facebook.com/cowboy0812 Andrew Kupchik

    GOD – THE IS THE WAY THE UNINFORMED AND IGNORANT EXPLAIN ANYTHING THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND, THAT THEY DON’T LIKE THE IDEA OF, OR THAT IS NOT A PLEASANT THOUGHT.
    I.E. HEAVEN – I WILL ADMIT THAT IT IS CERTAINLY A LOT MORE PLEASANT AN IDEA THAT WHEN YOU DIE YOU GO TO “HEAVEN” AND GET TO SEE ALL THE PEOPLE THAT YOU LOVED THAT DIED BEFORE YOU, AND EVEN GET TO EXPERIENCE THOSE PEOPLE IN A PERFECT UTOPIA THAT IS DEVOID OF ALL THE PROBLEMS THAT YOU HAD TO ENDURE THROUGHOUT YOUR LIFE.
    WHAT EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THIS? NONE
    TRUTH: WHEN YOU DIE YOU TAKE A VERY LONG, ACTUALLY PERMANENT DIRT NAP, WHERE YOU DECOMPOSE AND TURN INTO RAW ORGANIC MATERIALS THAT WILL EVENTUALLY BE REUSED.
    I GET THE FORMER IS MORE APPEALING THEN THE LATTER, BUT TELLING YOURSELF THIS IS TRUE DOES NOT CHANGE THE REALITY OF THE SITUATION.
    GOD – I EVEN FELL INTO “BUYING” (ACTUALLY ONLY RENTING” THIS CONCEPT ONCE IN MY OWN LIFE. (Lets see how it turned out)
    i.e. WHEN I WAS AT A VERY LOW POINT IN MY LIFE I WAS CONSIDERING ENDING IT ALL AS THE PERMANENT “DIRT NAP” SEEMED WAY MORE APPEALING THEN WHAT WAS ACTIVELY TAKING PLACE AT THAT TIME IN MY LIFE. AT THAT MOMENT SOMEONE I DIDN’T EVEN KNOW CALLED DOWN FROM AN UPSTAIRS APARTMENT IN THE PLACE WHERE I WAS LEAVING AND OFFERED ME A RIDE TO THE HOTEL WHERE I HAD ALREADY PLANNED MY DEMISE. TO MAKE A LONG STORY SHORT, SHE JOINED ME AT THE HOTEL I WAS STAYING AT EVERY NIGHT FOR THE NEXT MONTH AND A HALF. SHE SHARED SHE HAD TRIED TO END HER LIFE BEFORE, AND HAD BROUGHT WITH HER ALL KIND OF RELIGIOUS LITERATURE AND PROFESSED HOW GOD , JESUS, THE HOLY SPIRIT, AND HONESTY HAD CHANGED HER LIFE. SHE THEN HAD SEX WITH ME HAVING KNOW ME FOR SLIGHTLY LESS THAN 24 HOURS, AND NOT NORMAL SEX MIND YOU, ( WHICH WAS ALSO EXPLAINED WHEN SHE DECLARED THAT SHE HAD BEEN AN ESCORT (ANOTHER ILLEGAL ACTIVITY) AND PROCEEDED TO BE “MY PERFECT LITTLE MATCH” UNTIL TWO WEEKS AFTER MOVING IN. NOTHING CHANGED IN MY BEHAVIOR BUT SOMEHOW IT WAS NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE AND DESPITE ME HAVING PAID 986 OF THE 1200 TO MOVE IN, SHE MADE A LEGAL FOR A RESTRAINING ORDER BY CLAIMING THAT, “WHEN i SLAMMED THE DOOR TO HER CAR, i DID IT TO HARD AND IT CAUSED HEARING LOSS” . IF COURSE IT WAS DROPPED BUT I HAD ALREADY HAD TO MOVE OUT BECAUSE I WASNT EVEN ALOUD INTO MY OWN HOME. BEFORE I LEFT THOUGH, SHE MADE SURE SHE SCREWED ME ONE MORE TIME BY STEALING FROM MY ATM ACCOUNT 300.00.( i HAD NOT NOTICED THIS AT THAT TIME) SHE MOVED A GUY IN BEFORE THE HEARING HAD DROPPED THE CHARGES, AND EVEN ADMITTED “IF YOU HAD MOVED SOMEONE IN LIKE THAT i WOULD BE IRRATE” i HAD TO FIGHT THE LANDLORD TO ENFORCE MY LEASE AND SHE DIDNT HELP UNTIL SHE SAW THAT I WAS GOING TO BE THE WINNER AND THEN TOLD HER FRIEND OF TWENTY YEARS TO GET OUT. i CANT GO THROUGH THE ENTIRE REST OF THE RELATIONSHIP, BUT SHE STARTED MAKING ALLEGATIONS OF A DOMESTIC NATURE AND DESPITE NO MARKS, NO PROOF OF ANYTHING SHE GOT ME WITH A FELONY FOR MAKING THREATS (SHE MADE A 13 MINUTE STATEMENT TO MY ATTORNEY PROVING i DID NOT DO ANY OF WHAT SHE SAID, BUT WHEN IT WAS TIME TO “WOMAN-UP” AND GO TO COURT AND TELL THE JUDGE SHE DID NOT FOLLOW THROUGH. SHE THEN DROPPED ANOTHER RESTRAINING ORDER THAT WAS PUT ON ME BECAUSE WHILE SHE WAS OUT AND NOT HOME, i PUT FOOD IN THE OVEN AND IT BURNT BECAUSE i FELL ASLEEP (TOOK A SLEEPING PILL), AND EVEN SIGNED A DOCUMENT PROVING THAT SHE DROPPED THAT AND ANOTHER ORDER AND SWORE SHE WOULD BE ATTENDING MY HEARING TO SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT, BUT ONCE AGAIN WHEN THINGS DIDNT GO HER WAY, SHE AGAIN CALLED THE POLICE, MADE ALLEGATIONS THAT i KICKED, STRANGLED, HEADBUTTED, AND THAT i THROUGH HER OVER A COUCH AND INTO A WALL FOR 30-45 MINUTES. THE ONLY THING THAT TOOK PLACE WAS AN ARGUMENT AND THE DA NEW THIS AND DID NOT ASK FOR ASSAULT CHARGES BUT DID GET ME WITH THE NO CONTACT OR VIOLATION BECAUSE SHE DID DROP ONE OF THE OFP’S BUT NOT THE OTHER. ANOTHER PART OF HER PLAN.
    SO LETS SEE GOD SAVED MY LIFE, SO THAT HE COULD PUT A WOMAN IN IT THAT WOULD RUIN IT TOTALLY, MAKE FINDING EMPLOYMENT IMPOSSIBLE, AND SO THAT IT WOULD BE THAT MUCH WORSE THAN IT WAS WHEN I MET HER. HE USED A WOMAN WHO STOLE FROM ME, CHEATED ON ME, TRIED TO TURN MY FAMILY AGAIN ME (THATS WHERE SHE FAILED AND BECAUSE OF THAT i WILL STILL BE GETTING A BUSINESS STARTED AND WILL NOT BE FUCKED AS SHE THOUGHT) SO YES FOR THAT MONTH AND A HALF WHERE SHE PRETENDED TO NOT BE THE SOCIOPATH SHE IS, WHERE SHE PRETENDED TO NOT BE BIPOLAR, PRETENDED TO NOT HAVE BORDERLINE AND MIXED PERSONALITY DISORDERS, AND WHERE SHE HID VERY WELL THE PARANOID DELUSIONAL PSYCHOSIS THAT IS BEYOND OBVIOUS ONCE SHE NO LONGER IS HIDING IT, YES FOR THAT TIME I THOUGHT GOT HAD SENT AN ANGLE.
    WELL LETS SEE THE OPTIONS
    1. EITHER GOD SUCKS AT WHAT HE DOES OR HAS WORSE PLANS THAT REGULAR MORTAL MEN
    2. HE DOESNT EXIST AND IT JUST HAPPENED THAT THE CRAZY GIRL HAS NO OTHER FRIENDS AND THE ONE SHE HAD, WAS IN A RELATIONSHIP AND DID NOT HAVE TIME FOR HER, AND SHE WANTED SOMETHING TO DO SO SHE OFFERED A RIDE. SHE ALSO WANT SOMEONE TO SLEEP WITH BECAUSE IN HER MANIA SHE HAS OUT OF CONTROL HYPERSEXUAL ACTIVITIES, EVEN ASKING FOR ME TO BRING NOT JUST ANY GUY INTO A SEX LIFE, BUT TO BRING A GOOD FRIEND OF MINE IN. i WOULD HAVE TO SAY THIS IS THE OBVIOUS TRUTH , NO GOD
    3. IT WAS NOT GOD AT ALL, IT WAS THE DEVIL. I BELIEVE IN THE DEVEL EVEN LESS, BUT EVEN IF IT WAS THE DEVIL GOD STILL COULD HAVE STEPPED IN TO HELP. HE KNEW I WAS POURING MY LOVE, CARE, AND LOYALTY INTO A PERSON WHO WAS SOCIOPATHIC AND WHO WOULD RUIN MY LIFE THE WAY SHE DID TO HER PERVIOUS RELATIONSHIP. HE ALSO GOT ARRESTED SEVERAL TIME AND SHE KEPT FILING OFPS ON HIM FROM 2007 TO 2011.
    4. GOD TRIED, BELIEVED SHE HAD CHANGED AND TRIED TO GIVE HER ONE MORE CHANCE WITH A MAN WHO TRULY WANT TO BE HER KNIGHT IN SHINNING ARMOR, AND SHE SHOWED GOD THAT SHE HAS FREE WILL. THAT FREE WILL SHIT IS JUST AN EXCUSE BELIEVER USE WHEN YOU POINT OUT WHERE GOD HAS FAILED.
    ALRIGHT i AM DONE THE PROOF IS THERE!

  • Jack Bond

    Wow… Okay, I’m not reading that. Turn off the caps lock, create some paragraphs and cut out about 90% of that book you just wrote, then get back to me. Or better yet, don’t. Your caps lock gag alone reduced your credibility to 0 for me, so I’m going to ignore you now.