Advertisement
  1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

British Government Wants to Block Internet Porn, Make It “Opt-In” Only

Several British media outlets report that there’s a growing faction within the government that wants to block access to pornography across ”millions of porn sites, chat rooms and bulletin boards” online.

Citing concern for children, ministers including communications minister Ed Vaizey have been quietly approaching Internet service providers about setting up automatic blocks for porn sites such that their content is available only on an “opt-in” basis: “Now ministers want to see adult pornography controlled with similar technology, with sites blocked unless people specifically request access to them.” The pro-filter faction within the government acknowledges that parental controls for Internet content already exist, but says they are too difficult for most parents to set up.

Unsurprisingly, many people who value open Internet principles are alarmed by this:

The chief technology officer of a British ISP tells the BBC:

Experience with filtering systems, he said, shows that they are a very blunt tool that often blocks access to sites that could be useful. ”You end up with a system that’s either hugely expensive and a losing battle because there are millions of these sites or it’s just not effective,” he said. ”The cost of putting these systems in place outweigh the benefits, to my mind,” he said.

Mr. Davies also feared that any wide-scale attempt to police pornographic content would soon be expanded to include pirated pop songs, films and TV shows. ”If we take this step it will not take very long to end up with an internet that’s a walled garden of sites the governments is happy for you to see,” he said.

This isn’t a pornography issue: This is a censorship issue. The existing British Internet filter prevents people from accidentally viewing child pornography, but there’s a major qualitative difference between that and legal pornography, the blocking of which, as Davies points out, would open the door to a whole host of possible government blocks. It’s only a short step from asking ISPs to set up lists of sites for which customers need to “opt in” to cutting some of those sites off entirely.

(BBCGuardian via MeFi. Title pic via Arrested Development Wikia)

  • Ikkle_zasha

    I can imagine this annoying the ministers more than anyone as they’re not exactly holier-than-thou when it comes to smutty activities. Infact quite the opposite.

    Hampstead heath anybody?

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/personal-column-i-go-with-gay-strangers-we-have-our-own-code-409834.html

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=8829871 Jon Bershad

    Best image choice ever.

  • http://twitter.com/mrrix32 mrrix32

    Do I trust our Government? No
    Do I trust the Government with the power to censor our Internet? Hell No.

  • http://www.youtube.com/emogamer Christopher Chavez

    Call me a prude but I actually think this is a GREAT idea. Its way too easy for people to look at porn on the internet. ESPECIALLY kids. Having people “opt in” is a great way to keep kids out (probably the only way).
    I know people are saying this is a slippery slope to complete censorship but really, its just PORN. The crap of the internet. Most of these sites are just malware and virus infested anyway. I’ve kinda always felt the internet was a little too uncensored anyway… (bestiality, child porn, etc..)

  • Andrew Graham Hughes

    Calling some random MP ‘the British Government’ is like calling some random congressman ‘the American Government’.

  • John

    I have to agree with C Chavez, I have taught children in school and have seen first hand how easy it is. Had my computer worked on and the tech rep decides to go on a porn cite to test the computer then I get on it and a pop up comes over the screen in front of my children. Terrible stuff we can fix this an a opt in is a good start. This has nothing to do with sensorship it is an attempt to take the filth off the internet. Which should br the goal of everyone that has children, grand children, and so on. Lead by Example not be one is good advise.

  • Amused

    With your spelling you probably shouldn’t be teaching the next generation.


Abrams Media Network click here for advertising opportunities

© 2012 Geekosystem, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Self-Serve Advertising | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram