comScore
Uncategorized Friday, April 27th 2012 at 9:35 am

Players’ Attempt to Destroy EVE Online Economy Gets Thumbs-Up From Developers UPDATED

In-game economies are one of the more fascinating aspects of multiplayer games, and one of the most complex would probably be the space-themed MMO EVE Online. Now, some players are leading an all-out assault on the Jita system, the largest trading hub in the game, in an attempt to destroy EVE’s economy. In response to this existential threat, the game’s developer CCP says: Have at it.

According to Eurogamer, the assault — called Burn Jita — is being led by Alexander Gianturco. Gianturco, who sometimes goes under the name ”The Mittani,” is leading a group called the Goonswarm, named for their affiliation with the Something Awful forums. The group has already amassed a fleet of 14,000 Thrasher destroyers in an attack scheduled to begin tomorrow, though the battle may have begun early.

Sometimes chided for being more like work than play, EVE has built a complex economy and an enormous base of dedicated players that sometimes go so far as to organize themselves into corporations outside the game to reap in-game benefits. Though many games have cooperative aspects, the lengths players go through to be participant in the game’s economy is truly breathtaking.

Speaking to Eurogamer, the game’s lead designer Kristoffer Touborg said that this kind of enormous player-generated event is what makes EVE unique, and as such, should be allowed to happen:

“It’s what makes Eve a really good game,” he said. “Do you want to play a 15 minute match of Call of Duty that you won’t remember the next day, or do you want to spend four months manufacturing 14,000 Thrashers to do this? It’s just so big and awesome.”

Touborg went on to say that the assault might be good for the game’s economy, where many well-off players will lose a hefty chunk of their buying power and be forced to start again.

Interestingly, the EVE wiki seems to indicate that Jita became the game’s largest trading hub through emergent play and was not designated by the developers. In that light, it seems fitting that player-generated economic boom be threatened by player-generated economic bust.

Unfortunately, this interesting exercise in virtual economies has a darker side. Prior to his attempt to destroy the existing EVE economy, Gianturco made waves in the EVE community for encouraging a depressed player to commit suicide, and for others to join in. This sparked understandable outrage, and eventually led to Gianturco being banned from the game for 30 days — the end of which is noticeably tied to the beginning of the Burn Jita assault.

UPDATE:

This article has some more information for what, exactly, Burn Jita would accomplish. It seems that the plan is simply to kill everything in the area, and lay siege to it for as long as possible. The outcome would be scarcities and a reshuffling of the current economy, but most players would probably seek out a new place to sell their wares. Still, it could have far-reaching effects within the game world.

(via Eurogamer, image via EVE Wiki)

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • http://twitter.com/Jemimus Robert

    You guys might want to mention that Gianturnco spent the last year (before the suicide snafuu) as chairperson of the Council for Stellar Management – the elected representives of the player base, who have a voice in how the game is managed.

  • Eve

    Or that he resigned from CSM due to violating EULA by having a large group of people harass a single player.  Part of his “punishment” was having his account banned for 30 days.  His response?  Attack Jita.  Yes, it’s part of the way EvE is played, but give the full story.

  • http://www.facebook.com/shawn.burks Shawn Burks

     The plan to burn Jita existed long before the Fanfest dust up the only thing that changed was the excuse. Originally it was going to be to celebrate 10k votes on the CSM then with the ban it was delayed and the excuse changed to celebrating The Mittani’s return from exile.

    Hint Goons and company aren’t burning Jita for revenge they’re doing it for the sheer joy of the tears it’s generating.

  • http://twitter.com/frakwit jellydonut

    Destroying things isn’t ‘good for the economy’, ridiculous broken window fallacy at display.

    It is, however, good for the game, because what would make for a thriving and stable economy in the real world would make for a boring-as-shit MMO.

  • Anon

    i’ve gotta get back in this game!

  • Loktofeit

     Basically, Jelly, you agree with him. :)  He’s talking about the *game* economy, and situations that occasionally shake it up the safe stockpiles of the entrenched veterans often create opportunities for a shift in power. Again, it’s the *game* economy we are talking about in a *game* where the market is a part of *game*play. No one is saying this would be good for the real world.

  • Anthony Brown

     Nothing wrong with that.

  • Nicodemus

    “the elected representatives of the player base”

    Not really… he was the elected rep of Goon. They are not the only members of the player base.  Perhaps CSM 7 will proceed with a little less asshattery and grandstanding. Though I’m not exactly thrilled that Seleene is Chairman now…

  • Bob

    Exactly…Ive now seen several “news” sources cite the Burn Jita event as a “revenge” or “in response” to the banning/drama at fanfest.  Burn Jita was planned long before this.  Im not a goon (nor associated with them) but events like this are what makes EVE amazing (to me at least).    Keep it up and hats off to CCP for having attitude “go for it”. 

  • james

    this will protect you from AIDS

  • Homer

    Nerd powertrip.