comScore
Uncategorized Tuesday, March 13th 2012 at 8:00 pm

Solar Panels Made By Ion Cannon Could Halve Production Costs

Solar power is a pretty direct and elegant way to generate power. After all, most traditional fuels involve energy that originated from the sun in one way or another, and unlike oil, gas, even hydroelectric and wind, solar power doesn’t require any of those pesky turbines. You just sit a panel out in the sun and wait. The problem is, convenient as that all may sound, the actually production of solar panels has been pretty inefficient up to this point, making them prohibitively expensive considering their relatively low level of energy collection. Now, however, a new production technique utilizing a literal ion cannon may be able to halve the production cost of solar cells and make them even better in the process.

Currently, solar panels are made by slicing off thin pieces of crystalline silicon. Once you’ve gotten yourself a slice, you add some electrodes and cover it in protective glass. The only thing is that while conventional solar panels are typically about 200-micrometers thick, they’d still work just fine if they were significantly thinner; the only reason they aren’t thinner is because that makes for brittle panels and it’s just plain hard to pull off. That being the case, a lot of crystalline silicon is “wasted” on overly thick panels, not to mention the silicon “sawdust” generated in the process. It’s far from efficient.

A new process, championed by Twin Creeks, a solar start-up that just recently surfaced, claims to be able to solve both of these problems, vastly increasing the efficiency of the solar panel creation process. Basically, Twin Creeks uses a ion cannon to bombard sections of the crystalline silicon, embedding hydrogen ions 20 micrometers beneath the surface. Then, the bombarded silicon is heated, at which point the hydrogen ions expand into gas and shear off the 20 micrometer sheets. The sheets are then attached to a metal backing, which deals with the fragility problem.

By making 10 panels out of the material traditionally used to make one, and by making panels strong and flexible with a metal backing, Twin Creeks stands to revolutionize the solar panel-making-game, and drive the price down to where it might be able to compete with more traditional power sources. Granted, this is a pretty new development, so there’s no telling exactly how effective it can be in the long run, but at the moment, it looks like solar power just got way cheaper, and if that doesn’t encourage adoption, I don’t know what will.

(via ExtremeTech)

 

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • Gregory Williams

    If you want to encourage adoption of solar panels in America, your going to have to make it a religious issue with bill boards and full out multi-media campaigns.

    “When I said ‘LET THERE BE LIGHT’ I meant for you to use it”
                            A message from GOD the first advocate of SOLAR POWER.

    Then watch the conservative cultists heads explode.

  • Unownmew

     Why use Solar Electric when we can use Solar Thermal?  Solar Thermal is Far More energy efficient then Solar Electric, allowing for more uses in the Manufacturing Industry.  For generic household electric uses, just focus the Solar Thermal power into a vat of water, let it boil to produce steam, then let the steam turn the electrical turbine, and voila, not only “free” energy, but, a “green” replacement for coal, that can also be used as a replacement in manufacturing where extensive thermal energy is required, which, you can NOT get from Solar Electric.

  • Gregory Williams

     You should consider the facts that Solar electric is the easiest form of direct electrical generation, they are even developing low light sourced electrical generation and that in New Jersey a man came up with a solar electrical/electricity generating panel that works in the rain and off of moon light. I am all for solar water heating and direct solar air heating but it is the hardest way to generate electricity. The Navy made me a “nuke” and the greenest fuel is hydrogen – I suggest you research Stanley Meyer and “browns gas”, I will tell you it for a fact the described processes do not violate the third law of thermodynamics because it causes a destabilization of the covalent bonding at a molecular level allowing H2 O2 OH gases to form in the water and to rise and collect. Energy companies and governments they support do want people to have water fuel technologies, anybody can make their own hydrogen fuels.

    By the way you really must have a bug up your ….on this issue to respond to a 5 month old comment.