comScore
Uncategorized Monday, May 9th 2011 at 5:14 pm

DARPA’s New ‘Pelican’ Promises High-Tech Airship

DARPA’s ambitious Walrus airship may be dead in the water, but some of its high-tech concepts could still be taking to the air. Having received a cash infusion from DARPA, the airship company Aeros hopes that its Pelican craft could provide heavy-lifting capability from a lighter-than-air craft.

One of the major selling points of the Pelican is that it could solve a key problem that has dogged airship design having to do with buoyancy. As the aircraft’s motors burn fuel, it becomes lighter and starts to float upwards. To offset this, expensive helium gas is released from the airship. The Pelican would take a different approach to this problem, according to Aviation Week:

[The Pelican is] a 230-ft.-long, 600,000-cu.-ft. demonstrator for its rigid-aeroshell, variable-buoyancy (RAVB) technology. Inside the shell, comprising a load-bearing frame of carbon-fiber trusses covered by thin-gauge rigid panels, will be a membrane to contain the helium lifting gas. Inside that membrane will be pressurized pump-fed tanks. More helium under pressure in the tanks makes the vehicle heavier, and less makes it lighter.

In some of Aeros’ existing craft, this has been achieved with donut-shaped compartments that fit around the airship as pictured above. Using vectored thrust propulsion, this could allow the Pelican could take off and land vertically, hover, and land with little help from a ground crew. The company claims that the Pelican could even move cargo on and off ships without having to land. Aeros is planning a demonstration flight in 2012-2013, and has (as yet unfunded) hopes for a 60-ton capacity craft in the near future. But given the tenuous nature of military research, those plans could easily float away.

(Aviation Week, The Register, via Engadget)

Filed Under |
  • http://www.thechildhealthsite.com/clickToGive/home.faces?siteId=1 Edcedc8

    miss gaga? your dildo is ready!

  • http://www.thechildhealthsite.com/clickToGive/home.faces?siteId=1 Edcedc8

    miss gaga? your dildo is ready!

  • Anonymous

    Hi All,
    I hope one of the two drag inducing Helium storage tanks does not burst. The reason they are outside and not inside the envelope or gondola is that they can make a pretty good bang if they fail. Using Helium instead of Hydrogen might have got rid of the fire risk, but quite why DARPA is playing with a potential bag or gondola bursting bomb system is hard to figure.
    If they want to make real progress rather than waste money with basic research, they should follow the example of the US Army and put more funding into hybrid air vehicle development. Solar panels on the flat lifting body shape of the new HAV 304 would be an interesting research project.
    Regards JB (Airship & Blimp Consultant)

  • MK_Walden

    Igor Pasternak and WW Aeros are getting paid $5,000,000.00 for technologies he KNOWS is not his.I informed him LONG AGO, documented, that the DCB, what he calls “COSH” is my patented tech. http://members.fortunecity.com/jlnaudin/html/ltasxmlft.htm As to the “Geodaisic composite monocoque hull structure” he is getting PAID to “Study and develop” even Igor wrote a paper that included MY work on this, so he KNOWS he is getting government funding under false pretenses. Isn’t that a CRIME???http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Michael+K.+Walden+%2B+Pasternak+%2B+airship+structure&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=If this earmark passed then how do we “report him”?Comments?Best,Michael K. Walden

  • Tryphonkorm

    @ skyship007. Because hybrids are still LTA when offloaded.Their proposed suction system is a good idea to keep them on the ground but it keeps them pinned down.You realize that there will be times that they will have to move when unloaded e.g to get a load!If that RAVB works efficiently,the harder airship deficiency (buoyancy control and management) will be removed.

  • Anonymous

    A hybrid air vehicle takes off heavy enough not to need additional ballast control systems. Down vector and engine power plus suction can be used if required in extreme cases, but the COSH system is far too heavy, although it is interesting long term research. There is an explanation of the huge difference a lifting body shape, down vector and suction (If required) makes on
    http://www.hybridairvehicles.com
    and they can move with suction in use as that has already been demonstrated with HAV 3.

  • Anonymous

    Hi All,
    I have heard it was a copy before and that the Aeros 40B blimp is a copy of a Lightship A 60 but with a game playing side stick control unit. The first one crashed in a banana plantation in China, another in an Oakland Marina and a third in the Atlantic. Luckily even dodgy small blimps are very safe and the pilots could swim!!
    Regards JB (Gasbags comedy http://www.hybridblimp.net)