comScore
Uncategorized Sunday, September 23rd 2012 at 2:00 pm

Data Centers Waste Most of the Energy They Consume

Cloud storage is the future, that’s what every tech company, media outlet, and anyone who generally cares about technology has been saying for the last couple of years now. From Netflix to Amazon, from Microsoft to Google, every company is falling over themselves to provide users with access to as much data as they possibly can online. Cloud storage is by far the most convenient way to get access to any type of file you could every want, but that amount of freedom doesn’t come without a cost. According to The New York Times, most data centers waste a whopping 90 percent of the energy they pull from the power grid.

A large part of the problem is that data centers, the place where all those files we may or may not want access to at any given moment, are running at their maximum output all day, every day. While I think it wouldn’t be insane to assume to that there’s at least a few people using Netflix every moment of every day, data centers need to be prepared for millions and millions at any given moment.

According to the Times’ report, there are ways that most data centers could improve their efficiency and reduce their carbon footprint. Unfortunately, it’s very unlikely that any of these operations would implement such measures willingly. Data centers, given that they often store thousands of users’ personal information, are not prone to discussing their systems. Many centers also use proprietary technology in data centers, which they may be unwilling to discuss.

It’s like the old saying; “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” Unfortunately, if don’t fix it we’re going to need searching the universe for new inhabitable planets a whole lot sooner than we thought.

(via The New York Times, Image Credit; Sean Ellis)

Relevant to Your Interests

Filed Under |
  • Anonymous

    I’ve read that there’s a company going around the country buying up small over-the-air broadcast TV stations in or near major markets to sell back to the government to make room for added spectrum. Here in Boston, we have a million-watt TV station on channel 18 that nobody ever watches. The only reason it’s on cable is the Federal must-carry rule. If it went away, six megahertz of spectrum could be authorized in greater Boston.

  • Jack Bond

    As long as it doesn’t cost me more to support their efficiency, and as long as their wild goose chase to save the world from global magic doesn’t cost efficiency, they can do what ever they want.

  • Idlethoughts

    Jack Bond, I know you don’t believe in global warming, or at least not man caused global warming, and I also know there is a decent chance you will never have to face consequences for your generations irresponsibility, but I hope you don’t have children or grand children because wether you believe in it or not they’ll be the ones paying for it.

  • Jack Bond

    I’m all for being good to the environment, but I’m wary of things that do more harm than good. The world doesn’t need saving.

    Honestly, I’m paying for other people’s mistakes already, and the way things are going, it’s going to get much worse by the time I’m midway through life. I’m only glad I’m gay so that I don’t have to bring children into this ball of wasted human flesh.

    If I did have children, though, I’d definitely be able to raise them not to absorb every piece of sensationalist information they’re fed.

  • Idlethoughts

    The term “sensationalist” doesn’t really work for concepts backed heavily by scientific research.

  • Jack Bond

    Considering the only result of Global Warming so far is that gullible people have been taken advantage of for time/effort/money over the threat of some kind of catastrophe, I have to say it’s sensationalist.

    Don’t forget, plenty of scientific research has also disproved Global Warming.