comScore
Uncategorized Monday, April 2nd 2012 at 6:25 pm

Developers Say Wii U is Less Powerful Than PS3 and Xbox 360

It looks like the next generation of console will subject Nintendo to what this generation did: Anonymous developers have reported that though the Wii U will finally be a Nintendo console capable of delivering HD graphics, the console itself can’t match the graphical power of the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360. The point of contention being, of course, that the Wii U is a next-gen console, and won’t be as graphically powerful as consoles that will be considered last-gen when the Wii U releases.

First and foremost, it is important to note that — obviously — graphics does not a game make. The regular Wii, which was subject to the exact same speculation from anonymous developers (that the current-gen Wii was around equal in power to the last-gen PlayStation 2 and Xbox), sold through the gangbusting roof. Granted, the Wii had the lowest software sales out of the Big Three consoles, but the graphical power certainly didn’t hinder the actual hardware’s sales capabilities.

More than one developer — from different development companies, no less — anonymously told GameIndustry International that, quite simply, the Wii U isn’t as graphically powerful as the current-gen PlayStation 3 or Xbox 360. “The graphics are just not as powerful,” one source said, plain and simple. Another source lays it out with a little more detail:

“There aren’t as many shaders, it’s not as capable. Sure, some things are better, mostly as a result of it being a more modern design. But overall the Wii U just can’t quite keep up.”

Again, though graphics help, they aren’t everything, and one positive to a lower graphical power is usually that the console is easier to afford, as the less powerful bits inside aren’t as expensive. However, it is important to note that Nintendo’s gimmick this generation, the tablet controller that goes with the actual console, could be a logical reason as to why they might be skimping on the graphical components. The tablet controller will significantly raise the cost of the Wii U, so in order to keep the console cheap and affordable — something Nintendo is usually good about — they could, in theory, have to cut costs elsewhere.

So, it would seem Nintendo is putting the Wii U’s focus on the tablet controller, which would be fine, but as one anonymous developer points out, the PlayStation 3 and PS Vita combination offer the same features that the Wii U and its tablet controller do, saying, ”You can do everything with that combo that you can with the Wii U, and more.” That isn’t even to mention the significant upgrade in power that the PlayStation 4 — possibly titled the Orbis — would provide when paired with the PS Vita.

For Nintendo, the future is unknown rather than grim, whereas we can usually expect a similar performance for Sony and Microsoft throughout the generations. With the GameCube, Nintendo looked like they were done, but then the Wii came roaring in and saved the place. However, toward the end of the Wii and with the release of the 3DS, it once again looked like Nintendo was lost. So, we’ve seen this story before — this literal story about how Nintendo’s next console is on par with last-gen consoles — and only time will tell if ends up affecting anything. Really, as we learned from the Wii’s lifecycle, and is a basic gaming principle, good games sell consoles, and that’s most important. Nintendo would have to get on that, more than anything.

(via GameIndustry)

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • Victor

    So, first we have developers and engine developers ALL coming out and saying that the Wii U is X times more powerful than the 360 and PS 3. Then we have Vigil come out and say they arent going to be making a prettier game, but an innovative one. So, then they comment on the harware being on PAR with current gen. Directly contadicting what they said before. Now suddenly we have these anonymous developers saying it is weaker….something sounds fishy if you ask me.

  • GOODFELLARECORDS

    hummmmmmmmmm dunno—————-rain check please

  • Jackbondnj16

    The PSV/PS3 combo might be the same idea as the Wii U, but it’s also probably going to cost 599 US dollars again.

  • Mudkipz

    Can we atleast wait til E3 2012? I don’t believe this stupid rumor.

  • Victor

    Yes sir. Let me say this, developers have repeatedly said it was more powerful and did not mind attaching their names. Suddenly they are anonymous? Sounds like a false rumor to me.

  • ScreamFace

    Probably a case of, they made it one way. Look at the maths for the cost and have slowly been cutting back the technology to be cheaper.

  • Some dude

    No, graphics aren’t everything. But when a console can’t even put out cartoony graphics in the quantities needed, you get the pathetic attempt to bring games like “Dead Rising” to the Wii. There’s nothing like knowing just how many enemy bodies, moving or not, the game can handle before it maxes out and you don’t have to worry about any more baddies showing up until you move the existing corpses out of frame. It takes me back to my old PS2 days…

  • Jackbondnj16

    I don’t even care one way or another. It’s HD, so it’s better than before. I don’t compare Nintendo to lesser companies.

  • Victor

    Not arguing the fact that Nintendo is a better gameplay maker, bit comparing them forces everyone to get better. Competition is good.

  • Victor

    Except that the recent kits have been supposedly getting better. Again, those articles cited names.

  • Victor

    Yes, because having hundreds of enemies makes a better game. Sheesh. Anyway, we are in agreement that a more powerful console would be nice because Nintendo could blow our mind’s with that power.

  • Jackbondnj16

    Alright, I can accept that. Still though, I approve of Nintendo’s improvement, because while the graphics may not be as powerful as other consoles, they’re paving the way in most everything else.

  • Jackbondnj16

    That’s why you’ve gotta stick to games that don’t suck :)

  • Victor

    Meh, gonna go with the non anonymous repirts that it is more pwerful than current gen consoles. Why? Reliable sources, names, better and more specific details.

  • Nraats666

     Sounds like companies trying to slander nintendo…
    Also, the sales for the actual Wii-consoles has been and still is higher than PS3 or Xbox360

  • Pace

    Its no surprise if the WiiU is slightly weaker than the current gen. Nintendo always tries to hit the $200 price point marker with their consoles.  The Wii was the first one to push the price point higher but not by much. expect the Wii U to be $250 at launch.

    1985: NES – $199
    1991: SNES – $199
    1996: N64 – $199
    2006: Nintendo Wii – $249
    2012: Wii U – $249?

  • Jackbondnj16

    Even the handheld consoles are around that range.

  • Dontgoemo

    Not surprised, at all. And the third party game library will continue to slowly slip away.