1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

Dow Jones Crash Scare Thanks to Good Old-Fashioned Tech Error? (Update2)

Earlier today, the Dow Jones Industrial Average gave Wall Street — and a healthy chunk of the Internet — quite a scare when it fell more than 1,000 points before healthily bouncing back later in the afternoon. Early reports tied the plunge to the hot-button finance story of the day — the turmoil in Greece over debt concerns — but as new details emerge, it appears that technical or math errors may have been to blame for the severity of the Dow’s plunge.

According to Reuters, “A trading error at a major firm was to blame for the day’s market plunge,” and market officials at NASDAQ and elsewhere are reviewing market activity between 2:00 and 3:00pm. A CNBC reporter claims that “trading firm” may have been Citigroup.

CNN Money breaks it down further, tying the Dow’s mini-crash to “technical glitches” that caused Procter & Gamble share prices to drop 37% in mere minutes:

In one of the most gut-wrenching hours in Wall Street history, the Dow plunged almost 1,000 points Thursday, before recovering some, as on a technical glitch in the trading of Procter & Gamble stock and fears about the European debt crisis spreading.

The selling was exacerbated by a huge drop in Dow component Procter & Gamble (PG, Fortune 500). There may have been technical glitches which caused it to plunge 37% in minutes. P&G’s slump was responsible for 172 points of the 992.60 the Dow initially lost.

The CNBC reporter’s explanation in the clip below is even more mundane: he speculates, based on conversations with sources, that someone may have hit “b” instead of “m” at their trading terminal, trading a thousand times more shares than they had planned.

The Dow Jones bounceback doesn’t mean we’re in the clear yet: As Kimon Berlin points out, on 10/24/1929 — Black Thursday — the markets were down 22.6% at midday, but down only 2.1% at close. But the suddenness of the plunge illustrates the scary degree of power that computer-automated trading programs have over the market: Just one bad input can make billions of dollars move — and disappear — in very short order.

Update: According to CNN Radio reporter Lisa Desjardins, the tech error in question may have been on NASDAQ’s end.

 

Update2: Apparently, P&G wasn’t the only stock to experience a sudden, sharp decline: Stock for the consulting firm Accenture “plummeted from above $40 at 2:47 p.m. to $0.01 at 2:48 p.m,” pointing even more strongly towards a “technical snafu.” (h/t @dannysullivan)

(via CNN Money)

  • POTS

    Ummm… I’m very knowledgeable on computers, and this doesn’t seem like a computer glitch. The sell off occured over the course of a minute (not computer like, computers would operate in seconds). And another company had a big sell off? That doesn’t make any sense unless the same computer was used to track the prices, which again would happen in seconds, not minutes. Next, the decline in those stocks did not seem to be All to none, which would be more typical of a computer error and or crash. This seems more like a human cracked into the stock tracking computers, and lowered them himself. Or, a little less plausible but still possible, a person simply had massive quantities of money invested there and decided to sell off for something else. My guess he went into the investments that had a huge gain that day. The crack scenario seems more plausible. So its not simply and error like the government wants you to believe. And yes, I fully believe the governments involved in this to make use believe that the stocks are safe, which they are not.

  • Chris Reich

    You might be the biggest noob I’ve ever seen.


Abrams Media Network click here for advertising opportunities

© 2012 Geekosystem, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram