comScore
Uncategorized Tuesday, March 6th 2012 at 11:15 am

Report: Employers and Colleges Want Your Facebook Passwords

The perils and pitfalls of social networking are nothing new, and with more people putting more of themselves “out there” online it has become unfortunately necessary to prune one’s online public persona. However, some employers and colleges are taking the unprecedented step of demanding private access to user’s social networking profiles. In some cases this could mean being forced to “friend” a superior, or even ordered to surrender your password.

According to Bob Sullivan at MSNBC, some employers are doing more than simply looking over the information applicants have publicly available. Currently, the Maryland Department of Corrections asks that job applicants submit to a Facebook review. During this process, applicants must log into their Facebook accounts and click through their pages while an interviewer watches over their shoulder.

If this sounds intrusive, that’s nothing: Just a year ago, applicants had to surrender their user name password to interviewers. The practice would likely have continued if employees hadn’t complained to the ACLU.

Sullivan says that colleges are getting in on the act as well, requiring that members of school’s sports teams “friend” a coach or designated monitor. Once friended, students are further required to grant their social media minder “friends only” access, allowing them to see most of their Facebook activity. This isn’t being done in secret, either. The University of North Carolina reportedly went so far as to codify the policy in the student handbook. From Sullivan’s report:

“Each team must identify at least one coach or administrator who is responsible for having access to and regularly monitoring the content of team members’ social networking sites and postings,” it reads. “The athletics department also reserves the right to have other staff members monitor athletes’ posts.”

Ostensibly, these in-depth checks are designed to ferret out activity that is embarrassing, or illegal. In the case of Corrections officers, one main concern is gang affiliations. Meanwhile, colleges are concerned about scandals and potentially embarrassing behavior on the part of their students. However, all of these policies are built on the same backwards mindset that Facebook itself holds: If people don’t do anything wrong, they will have nothing to hide. Personally, I have lots I like to hide, and thankfully I am free to do so.

It’s easy to see how this could spin out of control. Perhaps after looking over your Facebook profile, an employer decides he or she doesn’t like how much time you spend on FarmVille (a time waster!) or the discussions you’re having about politics or religion. While it’s horrific that those in positions of power would demand this kind of personal access, it’s equally disheartening that people were willing to hand over their private lives for a job.

There are currently few protections for everyday folks from being pressured into releasing this kind of personal information. In response to the Department of Corrections reviews, Maryland is reportedly working on legislation to prevent this kind of behavior. Unfortunately, everyone else will have to fend for themselves.

(via Red Tape Chronicles, image via Dan Tentler)

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • Dr Coene

    So glad I don’t have a Facebook account.

    Reject the Hive!

  • Brent Stewart

    This is the very thing Google+ Circles was designed to circumvent. I ditched my FB account 4 months ago (family, friends, and all) and have never looked back once. On G+ I post pretty much everything except personal stuff right to public anyways. Wanna see what I’m saying, circle me. And even I circle you back doesn’t mean I’ll put you in a group I’ll post private stuff to anyways. They can say what they want about Google privacy policies. But G+ is a win/win situation.

    On the other hand anyone (school or employment) that wanted me to sign in during an interview process or ask me to turn over my credentials can kiss my lily white fat arse – I’ll seek education or employment elsewhere.

  • Martin Rix

    I still have a Facebook account (But prefer G+). Sure they can have my Password and Friend me on both!

    Bet they won’t get past my two-factor authentication or privacy settings ;) Admittedly this wouldn’t stop the over-the-shoulder method :(

  • Rikard Jo

    Same here, what do you say bout we both terminate our FB-accounts in favor of G+?

  • Triple Steak Guy

    UNC’s decision to do that was largely fueled by many of their football players bleating on Twitter and Facebook about all the ways in which they were breaking NCAA rules.  A traditional laissez-faire social networking policy would result in heaps of their athletes suspended from participation in athletics, as well as from the university itself.  Of course, the other thing they could do would be to recruit athletes of higher moral character, but this is very much not in the cards for UNC.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/FJ6H7B2JMRFKFQGL5HUVETT7FE Miguel Brugal

    You dont have to surrender your user name or password, its not required by law. Besides you can get back at these employers and schools, just add them if you want(totally up to you) and report them to facebook and over endulge on how they made you log in to your account or friend someone from work or school. Facebook wants to know so they can take legal action. These actions employers and schools are taking are double edged swords and you play it right you can screw them over, just do the homework all it takes is a couple of clicks.

  • http://twitter.com/SandersFirmPC Eric Sanders

    I can see how this would violate several civil rights lawshttp://www.thesandersfirmpc.com