comScore
Uncategorized Friday, October 19th 2012 at 1:50 pm

Family Circus Movie is Happening, Please Join Us in Praying for Death

The Family Circus, a cartoon known mostly for loving Jesus a whole lot and making the antics of surprisingly large dog Marmaduke seem edgy for the last thousand years, is getting its own movie. Before you ask, no, there is probably nothing you can do to stop it. The thing has been in development for a while, and now has actual writers, God have mercy on their souls. I think we can call this the official time of death on Hollywood having any decent or original ideas. In the interest of cribbing from old ideas that are actually good, it’s time to take the whole industry out behind the barn and do the merciful thing. Why? Because Family Circus is the worst thing in the history of time. Not the worst newspaper strip. Not the worst work of art. The worst thing.

Here’s where we have a bigger problem with a Family Circus movie, than, for example, a Garfield movie. In Garfield, you have some conflict. Garfield wants to eat all the lasagna. Jon doesn’t want him to eat the lasagna. Then, Garfield finds a way to eat the lasagna. Conflict, tension, resolution. It’s not exactly King Lear, but it’s something you can build on.

Not so with Family Circus. The whole point of Family Circus is that there is no conflict. For those of you playing along at home, this is the same factor that makes it interminably boring and awful in every way. The Family Circus is basically a Ned Flanders wet dream, existing in a world where all babies are cute, all grandmas are biological machines for dispensing cookies and sage advice, the one minority character seen in five decades of publication has sprung from the ether so no one can say the strip is utterly monochromatic, and there are no problems that can’t be solved in a single line drawing and a sentence that edges up to cleverness but never actually touches it.

It’s not that Family Circus is unfunny. That’s a pretty venial sin as far as ideas for movie adaptations are concerned. No, our abiding problem with Family Circus, and the thing that gets our blood up about it to this day, is that nothing happens. Not only are there no jokes, there are barely things that make the effort of passing for jokes. There’s no “there” there.

This is a cartoon so dedicated to the principle of being uncontroversial that literally two things have happened in the more-than-50 years this dreck has been polluting funny pages all over the country. Mommy got a haircut in the ’90s, and the family bought a cellphone to acknowledge the 21st century several years after it arrived. That’s it. Like the glorified elevator music of Jack Johnson, Family Circus is offensive by its inoffensiveness. It’s the sort of pablum you can only gag on, and if there were any justice in the world, it would be stricken from our collective memory. Instead, it gets a movie, because of course it does.

So the next time the RIAA complains about piracy hurting movie revenues, let’s please all just remind them that they have this cinematic war crime in the works, so maybe the problem here is actually a little bit closer to home. Until then, if you must read Family Circus, please, read it with Nietzsche quotes appended to it. It’s the only worthwhile thing this cartoon ever did.

(via Variety and our worst nightmares, image courtesy of The Nietzsche Family Circus)

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • Kate Drew This

    I’m not a fan of it either, dude, but it’s three square inches of newsprint. Calm down.

    Now, the movie eliciting groans/anger from people…that I understand. It’s a waste of the industry’s time and talent.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ian.chant Ian Chant

    God, such a waste. To your larger point, this is one of many things I could probably afford to calm down on, but FC has ALWAYS just irked the hell out of me, and I’ve found myself in good company on that point pretty regularly. Your point is well taken, though I think you might be surprised how many folks share my vitriol at this cartoon. That said, maybe I just hang out with folks who have vitriol to spare…

  • Pernoda

    Why!? Why must this be an actual thing, with writers and backers!? How did the producers figure out that there was a market, real people in fact, who would want to watch this uninteresting crap? Didn’t this ’50′s utopia type movie already happen with “Pleasantville”? At least that one had some kind of conflict. Why can’t they do a “Transmetropolitan” movie? I would rather pay money to see Spider Jerusalem spit vitriol.

  • Kate Drew This

    It’s probably your profession. I imagine that if I were a journalist, I’d have more vitriol than was healthy.

    ;)

  • http://www.facebook.com/ian.chant Ian Chant

    Like you wouldn’t believe, Kate. Thanks for your understanding.

  • Idlethoughts

    “Spider Jerusalem spit” Is this a thing? Seriously does that mean something because I am honestly really curious.

  • http://twitter.com/seriouslyyouguy you guys

    I’m all for this. Why? Whoever’s producing/investing in this is going to make huge losses. Capitalism works both ways, biaaaaaatch!

  • Kate Drew This

    I’m just thankful they haven’t made a Calvin and Hobbes movie. I love C&H, but you know it would be “heartwarming” and dreadful.

    Really hoping Bill Watterson doesn’t die anytime soon, because once he does…

  • weirdedout

    I’m a mom and the only thing family circus has done is remind me of things my child has asked me. How can they make a movie from something that has no plot?

  • Anonymous

    maybe it will be double billed with the “viewmaster” movie

  • Idlethoughts

    Their is a battleship (as in the board game) movie, we are so far past the point of no return it’s not even worth asking how they could make something a movie.

  • http://2nihon.com 2nihon

    Garfield, Marmaduke, Dennis the Menace, and now Family Circus…is the B.C. movie on the horizon?

  • http://2nihon.com 2nihon

    Or a live-action Peanuts! Think about the possibilities! (hoping no Hollywood execs are reading this)

  • http://twitter.com/KareesMoonshade Alua Oresson

    Quote: “the RIAA complains about piracy hurting movie revenues” I don’t think the Recording Industry Artists of America really care about movie revenues. The MPAA (Motion Picture Artists of America) might care though.

  • Christopher Helms

    Who is going to watch this movie? I Don’t Know… Not Me.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dan.mccullough.94 Dan McCullough

    Billy is the Antichrist.