comScore
Uncategorized Friday, June 29th 2012 at 1:35 pm

Graphene Can Improve Desalination Efficiency by Several Orders of Magnitude, Can Do Pretty Much Anything

Graphene. It can be stronger than steel and thinner than paper. It can generate electricity when struck by light. It can be used in thin, flexible supercapacitors that are up to 20 times more powerful than the ones we use right now and can be made in a DVD burner. It’s already got an impressive track record, but does it have any more tricks up its sleeve? Apparently, yes. According to researchers at MIT, graphene could also increase the efficicency of desalination by two or three orders of magnitude. Seriously, what can’t this stuff do?

Desalination might sound boring, but it’s super important. Around 97% of the planet’s water is saltwater and therefore unpotable, and while you can remove the salt from the water, the current methods of doing so are laborious and expensive. Graphene stands to change all that by essentially serving as the world’s most awesomely efficient filter. If you can increase the efficiency of desalination by two or three orders of magnitude (that is to say, make it 100 to 1,000 times more efficient) desalination suddenly becomes way more attractive as a way to obtain drinking water.

Desalination works exactly as you might expect; you run water through a filter with pores small enough to block the salt and not the water. It’s a process called reverse osmosis. The issue is that the thicker your filter is, the less efficient the process is going to be. If you know anything about graphene, you know where this is going. Graphene sheets are one atom thick. It’s sort of a best case scenario. Because it’s nanoporous and so insanely thin, it can let water (but not salt) through it without requiring the comparatively high levels of pressure that current filters do.

That said, there are a couple of roadblocks to using graphene for desalination. First of all, if you want to use a graphene filter, it’s important to have a lot of control of the size of the holes in the filter, or more accurately, the variation of the sizes of the holes. Put simply, you need to make sure that all the holes are small enough to keep the salt out if you want to achieve true desalination. When it comes to that level of accuracy, we aren’t quite there on the production side. We are, however, pretty close and getting closer every day. Second, you’ve got to make sure that the filter stays stable under pressure; if it breaches you’re going to lose a lot of process. The standard methods of reinforcing traditional filters should translate pretty easily to graphene though, so all in all it’s looking pretty promising.

We may not have jetpacks or flying cars yet, but graphene is looking like it may prove to be the sort of infinitely useful space age material that always gets such stupid names in sci-fi movies. And if the past is any indication, this isn’t the end of graphene’s application potential. Any bets on what’s next?

(via Water Online)

Seriously though, check out this material’s superpowers

Filed Under |
  • Anonymous

    How about making flags “of” graphene, that could perhaps generate electricity as the flag wiggle back and forth in the wind?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Jackson/698590300 Bill Jackson

    It seems to me that there is still a need for work input to overcome the osmotic pressure that wants the fresh water to enter the salt said of the membrane.

  • Gettingthesaltout

     in reply to Bill Jackson 
    seems easy enough, gravity, or gravity plus centripetal force ie a spinning drum? removing the build up of salt seems less trivial

  • FreddyB

     Wouldn’t you just back flush it?

  • TheGrapheneSolution

    Regarding what Graphene will be found capable of next: 

    It’ll be found to cure cancer.
    It’ll be found to cause cancer.

  • http://www.facebook.com/aryaba Arya Zar Bagherpour

    Make a salt scoop out of it, and an emergency drinking straw.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bruce-E-Screws-Jr/5200506 Bruce E. Screws Jr.

    I am still hoping for a space elevator.

  • http://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.com/ Evi L. Bloggerlady

    As Glenn Reynolds would say:  Faster please!  

  • Xiferstube

    try kynar

  • http://www.facebook.com/aryaba Arya Zar Bagherpour

    Not currently doable with modern materials.  When they figure out how to make cable out of graphene or carbon nanotubes, then we’ll be in business.

  • Anonymous

    Gulf countries would greatly benefit from this. The current water/electric infrastructure setup are power plants running on natural gas: boil sea water, turbines spin, collect fresh water from the boiled sea water!

  • Giles1414

    What’s to prevent the filter from quickly getting blocked (with salt) and what method is there to prevent this? What energy is required to flush the salt from the blocked filter?

  • OMCV

     This is just a better RO membrane. Most membranes packs are spiral wound to maximize surface area which makes pumps more effective then gravity or a centrifuge for applying pressure.  When you don’t know how well your system works you can always claim the theoretical maximum.

  • OMCV

    Just as a reference the osmotic pressure of sea water is 20-25 atm. To reach that pressure via gravity requires a column >190 meters. lifting water 190 meter requires a lot of pumps and infrastructure and it would be better just to use the pumps to push the sea water against the membrane.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1136602001 Will Curry

    In a vertically mounted or inclined drum the excess salt will be constantly flushed from the inner surface (the mineral side) by simply introducing more raw water than can be processed through the filter and allowing the excess to fall through, then reintroducing the higher salinity waste back into the inflow until it reaches a saturation level, which becoming inefficient, requires introduction of a refreshed salt water supply.

  • Cheddarlump

    You simply leave an outlet for the salty water.  So, out of 100 gallons going in to the filter, you get maybe 20 gallons of fresh water out, and flush the remaining 80 gallons of slightly saltier water back out.

  • Anonymous

    I hope the process does get commercialized. It would be great for southern California.  Would give them a readily available source of water, they would no longer have to steal water from farmers and other distant sources to maintain their lifestyles.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000437431778 Levi Clark

    What about using this process to sort heavy water from water, also if the size of the mesh is that perfect won’t it sort bacteria and other imputities. This might move beyond desalination to your every day sewer and water plant.

    BTW I would think that the centripetal force would exacerbate removing impurities from the “dirty” side. Maintaining a constant waste flow might simplify that, but that is probably a part of reverse osmosis already?

  • Joe Green

    Or you backflush, which if you use salt water will leave a little salt on the wrong side, but probably not too much.

  • Doug Jones

    Nope, sorry, it’s bullshit. Most of the energy required for RO desalination is simply the pressure needed to force the water against the osmotic potential, the thickness of the membrane does NOT waster 99% of the pumping power. Graphene might make RO a few percent more efficient, but it’s already very close to the thermodynamic limits. Typical press release hype.

  • Doug Jones

    I just did some searching, current high efficiency seawater RO systems need about 40 bars of pump pressure to overcome 27 bars of osmotic pressure. So the absolute BEST that graphene systems could accomplish would be to reduce power by (40-27)/27, or about 48%. Potentially useful, but not world-changing.

  • Anonymous

    This is probably a stupid question, but why not flip the filter so water dripps vertically downward and filtered water is then physically separated from the filter.
    My understanding of your comment is 27bars is needed to keep the filtered water from passing backward through the filter (natural mechanism to balance concentrations), but if you put the water on “top” and drip through the filter wouldn’t a) that create natural pressue to push water through the filter and b) prevent water from passing back up because it already dripped away from the filter physcially??

  • Doug Jones

     Gravity won’t get a chance to form drips if the water never gets through the membrane in the first place. The 27 bars is absolutely required to get any flow at all- what happens to the water after passing through is irrelevant.

  • Maxsuel, Brasil

    e filtrar o vapor? pode ser viável.

  • Slacknup

    No Back flushing. Just do what traditional RO units do. Recycle the salt water on the high pressure side and bleed off concentrate to maintain desired concentration.

    Heres an idea. Sell the concentrate to a “sea salt” company. Of courrse they would have to set up manufacturing close to the source.

  • Guest

    Some kind of device for making legible marks on paper? 

  • Abc

    water changes everything…
     

  • Mercurytraveller

    The main question is: “what is the required pressure for this system to work?” Is it the same as with the other membranes, or much lower?

  • Windfarmer

    Not if the membrane exits to air, for example on a drip tube irrigating plants but fed with saline water.

  • http://www.facebook.com/byudavis Robert Davis

    But you also need to consider membrane flow rate. Even if the pressure is still 40 bars but the flow rate is much faster, you will purify that much more water for a given pump power. That assumes the flow rate is mainly limited by the membrane rather than the pump.