comScore
Science Tuesday, February 26th 2013 at 7:30 pm

New Theory Tries To Explain Why Dinosaurs Grew So Huge — Especially Their Amazing Necks

Paleontologists  struggle with a lot of mysteries in their field of study, not the least of which is exactly what allowed some dinosaurs to get so insanely huge. In particular, the enormous necks of sauropods like brachiosaurus, diplodocus, or sauroposeidon (tallest of all dinosaurs, 56 feet in height) have long baffled researchers.Well, there’s a new theory about this, as some scientists suggest that unique respiratory traits and reptilian reproduction strategies allowed for such tremendous sizes and necks that have been unparalleled by any creature since.

Speculations about how dinosaurs got their growth spurts are many, and some of them suggest environmental factors like high oxygen levels or an overabundant amount of food. Strangely, baseball legend and noted non-paleontologist Jose Canseco recently tweeted that Earth may have had a low gravity in the old days, and that could explain the big animals our planet used to boast. This is not only an entertaining idea, but a great reminder of why we don’t get our science facts from has-been steroid abusers on social media.

Science writer Brian Switek has introduced a new theory, though, citing the studies of sauropod experts Michael Taylor and Mathew Wedel. The environmental factors could be real, if unlikely (except the gravity thing, which is just silly), but wouldn’t have acted as catalysts to the unheard of growth of sauropods. Rather, sauropods possessed a network of air sacs in their respiratory systems that made their bones, like those of birds, much lighter without the sacrifice of strength. With lighter bones, their necks could grow exceptionally long — in some cases nearly half the length of the dinosaur’s body.

Their heads were small, too, with no need for the musculature needed to chew the plant matter they consumed; they didn’t chew, and it’s still unknown just how they processed such vast amounts of food without a juicer. In any case, sauropods had the sheer body mass to support such long necks and tiny heads, proportionally outstretching the giraffe.

These are the necks of non-sauropods, who don't enjoy the luxury of super-long necks. Also, that's not a good place for a human to be standing without his face.

Then there’s the fact that sauropods were reptiles. Young sauropods were tiny — and probably adorable — and would have been numerous. Where mammals expend greater time and energy carrying and developing their young, dinos would unleash their brood en masse in expansive nesting grounds.

Brian Switek explains in National Geographic:

By externalizing birth and development, sauropods and other dinosaurs were able to sidestep the costs and risks that constrain mammal size. For dinosaurs, mechanical and other biological constraints might have prevented them from becoming even larger – the amount of time it would take for nerve impulses to travel to a 100-foot-long dinosaur’s brain for example. The fact that all the genera that are contenders for the “largest dinosaur of all time” title – including ArgentinosaurusSupersaurus, and Diplodocus – top out around 100 to 110 feet in length might indicate that these dinosaurs were reaching the anatomical ceiling of how large it was possible for them to get.

Even combined, these factors created a broad threshold for size, but they didn’t necessarily give the great sauropods their gigantism. That much is still a mystery. Short of visiting Skull Island with a well-equipped team of experts, the slow, unstoppable plod of paleontology may be the only way to unravel the mystery.

(National Geographic, images courtesy Wikipedia and From Taylor and Wedel, 2013 on svpow.com)

Relevant to your interests

 

Filed Under |
  • alice banegas

    I need my old gmail format please alicebanegas@email .com
    I don’t know what else you need

  • Anonymous

    Sauropods were closer to birds than “reptiles.”

  • Enthusiast

    I don’t know who this Josie chick is, but I think you should think twice again one more time before ridiculing her. Or not, but wouldn’t the Earth have had necessarily (minutely) less gravity before a gigantic meteor made its unwanted advances and killed the dinos?

    Our planet’s (I say ‘our planet’ because I never know when to capitalize E/earth… though, being at the beginning of the sentence, I suppose it would have been capitalized regardless) gravity is pulling stuff in all the time, increasing its mass. So, unless there is some force removing mass, we would be continually gaining mass and increasing gravity.

    That’s my excuse for gaining weight every year, at least.

  • http://twitter.com/MichaelDubnik Michael Dubnik

    and yet the “has-been steroid abuser on social media” is not the one that comes off as a bitter, pretentious prick. Is insulting the man really necessary to attempt to sound intelligent?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Babu-G-Ranganathan/1326164630 Babu G. Ranganathan

    NO HALF-EVOLVED DINOSAURS! Just google the title to access this popular Internet article of mine.

    Babu G. Ranganathan
    (B.A. Bible/Biology)

    Author of popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS

    *I have given successful lectures (with question and answer period afterwards) defending creation before evolutionist science faculty and students at various colleges and universities. I’ve been privileged to be recognized in the 24th edition of Marquis “Who’s Who in The East” for my writings on religion and science.

  • Velexia Ombra

    Seriously…?

  • AJ

    Agreed, that was really unnecessary.