comScore
Uncategorized Monday, September 20th 2010 at 1:59 pm

How a Photoshopped Picture of Sir Ian McKellen Fooled the Internet

This past weekend, Sir Ian McKellen attended an event in Hyde Park to protest the policies of Pope Benedict XVI on the Pope’s very first state visit to the UK. Shortly thereafter, the photo to the above left began to make its way around the tubes, wherein McKellen wears a shirt that says “I’m Gandalf and Magneto. Get over it!” The Internet being the Internet, it “went viral,” as the kids say, with the picture getting more than 250,000 views on Twitpic, close to 200,000 more when it was ripped to Imgur, and who knows how many more via blogs and other third-party sources.

Indeed, it is a pretty awesome shirt. However, it is not the shirt that McKellen actually wore to the anti-pope rally: Rather, he wore the shirt to the above right (“Some people are gay. Get over it!”) which actually makes a lot more sense considering 1) that the typeface changes in the Gandalf shirt, but is consistent in the real thing; 2) that the protester behind him is wearing the same shirt in both instances; and 3) that as mind-blowing as is the Gandalf-Magneto singularity presented by McKellen, the Church’s positions with respect to homosexuals are a bit easier to protest. All good Photoshop fun, maybe, but it apparently actually fooled a lot of people; The Advocate ran the ‘shopped McKellen shirt on their website before correcting it, and lots of social media sharing of the picture takes it at face value. As The Daily What wrote when they debunked the ‘shoop earlier today: “Before this goes so far that it gets picked up by the Times … right – real; left – fake.” It’s instructive how this happened:

On September 18th, shortly after the BBC article ran, writer and illustrator Greg Stekelman tweeted out the Photoshopped pic with the deadpan caption, “I see Ian McKellen joined in the anti-Pope march in London today.” Not much later, as the pic began to garner retweets, he clarified, “I point out that Ian McKellen didn’t actually wear that t-shirt. I photoshopped it. The original said: ‘Some People Are Gay. Get Over It.’” Had Stekelman been setting out to hoax the world in this decidedly minor way, he would have undercut himself far too quickly.

Luckily for the propagation Gandalf meme, he didn’t have to: The picture spread, buoyed by celebrity tweeters like Simon Pegg, who seemed to be in on the joke — he wrote, “Magneto was at the anti-pope rally! That explains why the pope mobile is made from reinforced neo carbon fibre” — but who didn’t credit Stekelman beyond linking to his Twitpic, much to the latter’s ire. (The sources of Twitpics, while visible when browsing from Twitter.com, are often obscured when viewed in Twitter clients.) The pic hit the Reddit frontpage via a sourceless Imgur link, though in fairness to Reddit’s upvoted comment system, the top comment linked to the BBC article and debunked the pic. As the ‘shopped pic continued to spread, that final layer of context was stripped away, such that a humorist’s Photoshop which obviously referred to a real-world event became an uncredited Photoshop became, in the minds of many who saw it, an actual photograph. This is how very many things happen on the Internet.

Stekelman, the forgotten originator of the pic, had the following to say, in cartoon form:

So that’s that. But the “Gandalf and Magneto” idea has proven so irresistible, it’s managed to cross the gap into reality after all: “Before somebody else makes millions off them,” Stekelman is now selling the ‘Shopped shirt-made-reality on Cafepress.

Filed Under |
  • themanwhofellasleep

    This is Greg Stekelman, the guy who did the photoshopping of the t-shirt.

    I should say that I did the cartoon response when I was feeling in a particularly grumpy mood and I owe Simon Pegg an apology. I know he wasn’t deliberately passing off my work as his own, and indeed this morning he tweeted giving me credit for the pic and generally being very nice to me. Given that he has 500,000+ followers, I suspect that my original replies to him, asking him to add my username to his tweet probably got lost in the constant flood of replies he gets. He’s a lovely bloke and it wasn’t really fair to drag him into my storm in a teacup.

    Incidentally, a few people have asked me where I found the original pic of Ian McKellen. It was on a BBC news story about the anti-pope rally and the photo is uncredited. It would be nice if the photographer were named, so they could also take some credit for what has become a bewilderingly popular meme.

  • feline1

    What the f*ck is it with your utterly egregious lack of prepositions?!? One doth protest ABOUT the Pope. You people make me sick with your linguistic depravity.

  • GS42

    I wonder if Greg asked permission from the photographer to use and modify their work in this way? He took the time to write a huge rant about Simon Pegg did not give him proper credit yet it’s he’s just ripped off a photographers image. If you can’t ask permission from the person who took the picture you should not be using it, or perhaps Greg thinks it’s acceptable to take work belonging to someone else and use it as they see fit without permission.

  • Hives

    I think it’s hilarious that Greg Stekelman should get so grumpy about people who redistribute his work without crediting him, when he doesn’t credit the original designer of the shirt – the campaigning group Stonewall – either on his cafepress site, his twitpic site, or anywhere else that I have seen. If you are going to be precious about ‘good internet manners’, then you should hold yourself to the same standards you are demanding of others.

    But yeah – it’s an awesome shirt.

  • GS42

    Hives, perhaps others should start ripping off Greg’s work and see how he likes it.

  • Hives

    GS42, what you call “ripping off”, I think I’d call “transformative work”, as as such I think it’s perfectly valid. I’m fine with Stekelman doing the original photoshop picture, I’d just like to see him give credit where credit is due, especially as he’s so precious about making sure others give credit to him.

    I think where it gets a bit grey-area is in selling the shirts on cafepress (where, incidentally, they are nearly twice the price as the original), since his shirt is riffing off a shirt used to raise funds (and awareness) for a nonprofit organisation. I think he might have been wiser to approach Stonewall themselves to see if they’d do an ‘official’ one, and share the profits. I’m nothing to do with Stonewall, so I have no idea if they’d even want it, but it would have seemed good internet manners to ask…

  • GS42

    Surely it’s only good manners to get the copyright owners permission before you use someone’s work. It’s certainly bad manners to use a photograph without the owners permission and then cry about people not saying how clever you are every time it is reproduced. As someone who has had their work ripped off in this manner in the past it’s sad that people find copyright infringement acceptable especially when they are likely to be sensitive about how their own work is used by others.

    As to selling the shirts, well perhaps the profits can be given to a charity acceptable to the photographer and the original shirt designer.

  • themanwhofellasleep

    The original photo appeared on the BBC News website but there was no photographer credit. Had there been a photographer named I would have credited them for the photo.

    In terms of “getting their permission”, I have to admit that when I photoshopped the picture I just viewed it as a bit of fun to entertain my twitter followers. Countless thousands of photoshopped pics are posted on Twitter every day and I don’t think anyone ever approaches the original photographer to get their permission first. Perhaps in future they should.

    Most of my twitpics are viewed 200-300 times so I wasn’t really expecting many people to see the picture. When people started retweeting the picture without crediting me I did get annoyed, but after a while I realised that it’s actually very hard to “own” something on the internet. Once it’s out there it’s out there and no-one really cares who first created/transformed/pimped it. A healthy attitude.

    I have approached Stonewall about them either producing their own version of the t-shirt or accepting any profits I make from the cafepress versions.

  • GS42

    “after a while I realised that it’s actually very hard to “own” something on the internet. Once it’s out there it’s out there and no-one really cares who first created/transformed/pimped it. A healthy attitude. ”

    It’s not that healthy if someone else makes a profit from your work though (I’m talking generally here and not specifically to this one image). The ‘no one cares who created the original’ attitude could well end the whole creative process for many people with images specifically withheld from the internet and general viewing by the public. I know of two artists who do not allow images of their work to be shown online just because of the ‘now it is online anyone can do what they want with it’ attitude’. Every image I put online now has a small watermark with a url on it, I don’t like putting it there, and I make it as unobtrusive as possible but I’d rather my images were not taken by others for profit.

    As to how many people view the image, does it matter if 2 or 20000 view an image that has been modified without the copyright holders permission, theft of someone’s work is still theft.

    I hope Stonewall put the profits to good use, well done for passing any on.

    Finally Greg I must say that my comments are not meant to be insulting or attacking to yourself but I get really p*ss*d off by the attitude that putting images online equates to giving away the image as a free for all, I believe in showing respect to the original artist/photographer regardless of what medium they use to display their work.

  • dhruti

    Hello – I’ve only just come across all this – but I took the original pic for work while I was with the protesters. Everything that’s happened since because of Greg’s work is pretty fascinating…

    Here’s some proof:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11359512 (my feature)

    Our live page archive that day: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/9012767.stm

    Dhruti Shah

  • Robert Quigley

    @dhruti Interesting! And great pic. Thanks for commenting.

  • Wombat!

     You’re still taking it way too seriously.

  • Frank

    I’m a graphic artist, I do things like that for work. I understand.

  • Naw

    magneto, gravity squeeze, gay rights march, gedttit? hahaha

  • Johnny

    you sound like a self-righteous narcissistic moron who shoves in words awkwardly to come off as if you had some form of privileged higher learning. Shut the fuck up you sound worse than the average in your attempt to be superior with you “linguistic skills”

  • http://www.facebook.com/badamrock Adam Brock

    How does he “shove in words awkwardly?” Are you offended that his vocabulary is far more extensive than your own? Is your butt hurt that you don’t know the first thing about grammar? I’ll try and write simply for you.

    You can’t spell. You can’t use proper grammar. You are replying to a 10 month old post. He can’t “sound” like anything to you because his response is typed on a computer.

    TL;DR: You are a complete moron.

  • Fhyhyjk

    You do realize that (although out of focus and pertaining to poor resolution) the stonewall logo is depicted on in the lower right (McKellen’s lower left) corner of the shirt itself, right? He may not have directly credited them, but I’m pretty sure that when it comes to merchandise, if you keep the logo or insignia of the original creator of the product in the work you make then you’re pretty much giving them some level of acknowledgement. Not only that but it’s not like he got any profit out of shopping the original picture anyways (outside of acknowledgement) – and even then he still listed the source of the original picture (i.e. an anti-pope march in London), which would also serve as accreditation since Stonwall is the one supporting the march via their shirts – and then if that wasn’t enough; Greg Stekelman is one person. Stonewall is a whole organization. This thing went viral in a matter of days. Any discrepancies Stonewall might’ve had with Greg’s shopjob would’ve been resolved in court.

  • Diogorenan

    I just got the same image sent to me via facebook. One year later. Tell me it isn’t something to take seriously.

  • Jennifer Hughes

    Wow. I thought feline1 was pedantic, but you’re actually going to object to as thoroughly dead a dead metaphor as as saying text “sounds” like something? Do you also object to “I see what you mean” when used in response to spoken language? Should people not talk about how they “feel” when they mean their thoughts and emotions rather than their senses of touch? Should people not “smell trouble” or get a “bad taste in their mouths” unless they actually tasted bad food? I mean, seriously. I value good grammar, but you’re making us all look bad.

  • Guest

    And where is McKellen claiming, that he is not only Gandalf AND Magneto, but also the person who this is all about? He is the one who should claim the right of propagation. But maybe its not that important, it seems… ;)

  • http://www.facebook.com/buckletheband Buckletheband

    Did the photoshop guy ever credit the person who took the original photo?

  • http://www.facebook.com/teddymv Teddy Monte Verde

    You still can’t just put their logo on something you’re selling and call it legit and make a profit off of it!!! So by your logic I could just start printing shirts with the Nike swoosh on it and thats ok because I credited them by putting their logo on it? If this guy did indeed copy their shirt (logo included) he is still at fault

  • http://www.ucmeta.org/Pages/Christine-Breese.php Christine Breese

    Amazing what you can do with a software program these days. 

  • Wildbullagow

    I think they were being ironic.

  • Frankie

    Maybe if you actually did a GOOD photoshop job…

  • http://twitter.com/John_C John C

    A year and a half later and I’m only NOW getting this on my Facebook stream from a friend.  In the USSOPA, this would not go unpunished.  Props, took me a minute to realize it was photoshopped originally.

  • Michael Lee

    Can you also debunk the one showing Harrison Ford wearing that same shirt that reads, “I’m Han Solo, Indiana Jones, and Blade Runner, and I’m fuckin’ over it!”?

  • Earth

    Greg,

    Quit crying. You didn’t invent the lightbulb, you made a funny picture. Hang it up on your mum’s fridge and let it go.

    -earth

  • TheFaceofBoe

    That would be awesome if someone made a t-shirt for David Tennant that said I’M THE DOCTOR. GET OVER IT!

  • Random

    You don’t have to credit the person in the picture for being in the picture, especially when it’s obvious who it is

  • http://www.facebook.com/patrick.michael.9277 Patrick Michael

    I still like either one.

  • BlueFlayme

    It’s back and making the rounds again on facebook. (5/19/13)