comScore
Uncategorized Tuesday, July 26th 2011 at 3:18 pm

Spatial Impossibilities Made The Shining Even Creepier

Stanley Kubrik’s excellent horror film The Shining has been unnerving audiences for over two decades. Between command performances by Jack Nicholson and the entire cast, some strong source material from Stephen King, and brilliant direction, it has maintained a reputation as a truly horrifying movie. But one key aspect of the film is the fact that most of the sets for the Overlook Hotel, the central location for the film, are spatially impossible.

This has long been known, but recently highlighted by Rob Ager, who created two YouTube videos on the subject. He says that the impossible nature of the hotel was first brought to his attention by an acquaintance who attempted to create an Overlook Hotel map for the original Duke Nukem. This led Ager to conduct an exhaustive study of the film, and visit the Kubrik archives in London to see the original plans for the sets. Ager confirmed that the hotel is packed with impossible windows, doors that lead to nowhere, and whole rooms that cannot exist inside the hotel.

Now, you may think that these are simple continuity errors to be relegated to the “goofs” section on IMDB, but that’s just not Kubrick’s style. For instance, when making his excellent dark comedy Dr. Strangelove, Kubrick perfectly recreated the then-classified interior of an American bomber without having ever seen it. His attention to detail and painstaking style of film making is well documented, which just about rules the bizarre sets used in The Shining out as mere accidents.

Ager believes, and I am inclined to agree with him, that the spatial madness is entirely intentional. The Shining is a horror movie, but one that relies as much on atmosphere and tension as it does on shock and gore. As the camera weaves around the labyrinthine Overlook, the viewer is disoriented and the set feels inescapable and overwhelming. It’s an otherworldly film, and without ever directly acknowledging it in the movie itself, Kubrick projects that sense to the viewer.

Ager’s videos are a fascinating dissection of the film, and a wonderfully thorough look at how Kubrick used this particular effect. This alone forgives them for being about ten minutes each. Consider them your required viewing of the day.

(via Daring Fireball)

Filed Under |
  • guest

    I’m sorry, but I don’t agree with the idea that there’s secret meanings or developments involved in the set. Basically, the set was just built. Obviously, not everything can connect to everything for camera and scene purposes, so some areas of the set will be detached. If you looked at any movie, you could find that. Any movie. Also, the hotel in the mountains is a lodge in Oregon, and it was only used as an external view. The set is completely separate, obviously, otherswise everything would connect. The point of the set was to emphasize the fact the the family was in a huge hotel all alone. If sets dont match up, that’s because it’s a movie and it’s impossible. The end.

  • guest

    I’m sorry, but I don’t agree with the idea that there’s secret meanings or developments involved in the set. Basically, the set was just built. Obviously, not everything can connect to everything for camera and scene purposes, so some areas of the set will be detached. If you looked at any movie, you could find that. Any movie. Also, the hotel in the mountains is a lodge in Oregon, and it was only used as an external view. The set is completely separate, obviously, otherswise everything would connect. The point of the set was to emphasize the fact the the family was in a huge hotel all alone. If sets dont match up, that’s because it’s a movie and it’s impossible. The end.

  • anonymous

    It’s a MOVIE set. Not everything can match up okay?

  • anonymous

    It’s a MOVIE set. Not everything can match up okay?

  • guest

    I wish it was all shot in a real hotel. When I found out it was a built set, I must admit, I was a bit disapointed.

  • guest

    This was fantastic, very interesting and thoughtful.

  • Christophercurtiskelley

    I always found it odd Kubrick chose the Timberline Lodge on Mt Hood. The building is weirdly angled and is actually very small compared to the interior setting of the film. Plus it’s on a slope and looks nothing like many of the other exterior shots (and has no maze).

  • Red44443

    It’s Kubrick. It had to have a meaning. 

  • Steveoboss

    If you think Kubrick didnt know *exactly* what he was putting on his film, then you’re a moron

  • Zane Dufour

    Kubrick does NOT make mistakes. In any other director’s works, bar kurosawa, you would have a valid point. This is the director who BUILT A B52′s interior when noone outside the military had seen it.

  • Kerry

    Regarding the maze – In the book topiary animals (huge ones) come to life & start walking around. At the time the movie was made, special effects didn’t exist that could create it. So, Kubrick used the maze instead. He actually wanted to plant a hedge maze & have it grow somehow through the film. This proved cost prohibitive. The maze doesn’t exist as it was built using a sound stage. I LOVE this film and I don’t think there are any accidents in this film. I think his use of expansiveness and isolation, goes well with the tone of the film.