comScore
Uncategorized Monday, October 3rd 2011 at 5:43 pm

Kindle Touch 3G Can Only Browse the Web on Wi-Fi

It appears that the Kindle Touch 3G, despite having 3G right in its name, will only be able to surf the web with Wi-Fi. The 3G capacity can be used to sync books and browse Wikipedia, but anything aside from those two activities will require a Wi-Fi signal. The weirdest part of that limitation, however, is that a previous Kindle model, the Kindle Keyboard 3G had, and appears to retain that very feature.

The limitation came to light after a clarification was posted on the Amazon forums. While the Kindle Touch 3G’s website touts “free 3G wireless” which is technically true, it doesn’t say anything about the restriction. The post on the forums, however, makes it perfectly clear: The 3G is expressly for syncing books and looking at Wikipedia. The “experimental” web browsing present on the Kindle Keyboard is going to stay were it is.

What this will ultimately mean for Kindle Touch 3Gs is still up in the air. The lack of 3G web browsing means that upgrading from the Wi-Fi model to the 3G model –a jump of $50– is going to be a little bit harder for most users to justify considering the only real benefit of the feature is 3G syncing. There could be any number of reasons behind the limitation but it is probably related to the fact that in order to provide “free” 3G, Amazon has to cover the cost of the 3G usage. If the Kindle Touch 3G doesn’t deliver as high of a profit margin as the Keyboard right out of the gate, it’s quite possible that Amazon just isn’t willing to foot the bill with these devices.

Regardless of the reasoning behind this restriction, one thing is for sure: This doesn’t affect Kindle Fire sales at all, since the fire is Wi-Fi only. It is likely to skew the sale of other Kindles in interesting ways. It’ll be interesting to see whether or not the touch capability will be able to beat out free 3G web browsing, and whether or not Kindle Keyboard 3G units will see a sudden spike in demand.

(via Ars Technica)

Filed Under |
  • Anonymous

    Kindle Fire doesn’t have microSD slot that Nook Color has thus it is
    stuck with 6 GB usable internal storage unlike Nook Color that can get
    up to 32 GB card in. Kindles are made to be almost like a “dumb
    terminal” of the past to make sure you’re tied up to Amazon’s storage on
    the web (for which you need Wi-Fi connection to get to.) and you can
    only store content you get from Amazon there, not other files and they
    can spy on your web activities through the new cloud-integrated web
    browser. Also, VERY IMPORTANT – lack of microSD slot means that if you
    decide to root your Kindle Fire, you’ll have to root the actual device
    thus there will be no coming back. On Nook, you can make it boot from a
    “rooted” microSD card and if you want to get back to the original Nook
    you can just take out the card and reboot. Nook Color still has the best
    on the market anti-glare coated screen that is better for 
    eading/viewing outside.

    B&N is rumored to be coming out with Nook Color 2 shortly that will
    sure to have Netflix app among others (you won’t find it on Kindle).
    Nook Touch is still better designed than even the new Kindle Touch with
    battery lasting two months with ONE hour reading a day with Wi-Fi off
    thus it’s still twice as long as new Kindle’s two months with HALF and
    hour a day with Wi-Fi off. It looks like Kindle didn’t get any battery
    improvement in the new model, they only changed the test condition.
    More, Kindle Touch still flashes black on each page turn while Nook
    Touch reduces the flashing by 80%.

  • Lakotahope

    I hooked up my kindle 3g wifi and tested it to make sure I could still surf the web.  I could. I was able to access many websites and without the wifi connection.  Is this going to be grandfathered into existing Kindle 3G Wifi’s? Or will this access be cut soon?
    I will return this Kindle if the 3G functions are limited to Amazon/ Kindle sales sites.  Any answers ????thanks

  • Kristen

    The purpose of my eBook reader is reading books. Period. Since I travel a lot and read often in areas where I have no WiFi connectivity, the 3G is a must when I want to read something new. It doesn’t matter to me if I can surf the web since I have my Android phone for that.

    I much prefer the Nook (for many reasons, not the least of which is its expandability) and have loved my Nook 3G, but now that its battery no longer holds a charge, I’ve jumped to the Touch 3G. B&N told me they will no longer be offering a 3G option for readers like me and the tablet-style readers just don’t have the battery life I need for my intermittent reading habits.

    I think for the average reader who have no need to d/l on the fly, where WiFi is spotty, the 3G makes no sense, but for the rest of us, it’s going to be the determining factor on which eBook reader we choose.

    I just hope B&N changes their mind. I’m not a big fan of the Kindle.

  • Lucian Nertan

    I travel and roaming internet is 1 mb for 9 euros, wtf.
    I bought it mostly for 3g as i need access to internet for gmail. I got screwed.
    Thanks amazon.