comScore
Gaming Sunday, September 19th 2010 at 12:55 pm

Mature Games To Minors Supreme Court Case Has New Defender: Stan Lee

In an open letter published on the Video Game Voter’s Network website, Stan Lee has thrown his support behind the game merchants of Schwarzenegger, Gov. of CA V. Entertainment Merchants, Et Al., the case headed for the Supreme Court which will give a federal ruling on whether it is constitutional to prohibit minors from purchasing violent games.

Lee makes very appropriate comparisons between the current mainstream worry about children playing violent games and the same fears about crime and horror comics in the nineteen fifties.  Hopefully the public’s fears of video gaming can be resolved without a restrictive self-imposed system of censorship that artistically hobbled the industry for a decade and a half.

We’ve excerpted some of Lee’s letter below:

I created Spider-Man, Iron Man and the Hulk, the virtual ancestors of the characters in today’s games. In the 1950s, there was a national hysteria about the so-called “dangerous effect” comic books were having on our nation’s youth.

Comic books, it was said, contributed to “juvenile delinquency.” A Senate subcommittee investigated and decided the U.S. could not “afford the calculated risk involved in feeding its children, through comic books, a concentrated diet of crime, horror and violence.” Comic books were burned. The State of Washington made it a crime to sell comic books without a license. And Los Angeles passed a law that said it was a crime to sell “crime comic books.” Looking back, the outcry was — forgive the expression — comical.

The more things change, as they say, the more they stay the same. Substitute video games for comic books and you’ve got a 21st century replay of the craziness of the 1950s. States have passed laws restricting the sale of video games and later this year, the Supreme Court will hear a case about one of those laws, this one passed in California. Why does this matter? Because if you restrict sales of video games, you’re chipping away at our First Amendment rights to free speech and opening the door to restrictions on books and movies.

The Supreme Court should find the law unconstitutional, as lower courts have. But politicians will keep looking for ways to restrict the rights of gamers and computer and video game artists because it makes for good headlines to say they’re “protecting the children,” even if they’re doing no such thing. They do so despite the fact that the industry has a remarkable rating system in place already and all new consoles have parental controls — both of which help parents ensure parents are in control of what their children play. But you can help fight the battle against politicians.

You can read the whole letter at the Video Game Voter’s Network, here.

(via Bleeding Cool.)

Filed Under |
  • kylemac

    I swear to god – people need to stop getting their knickers in a twist anytime something comes up. The more scientific research that’s done the more it’s shown that complete immersion in a fantasy environment can severely warp your sense of reality/morality – a sense that is still developing as minors. Now we can blame parents for letting kids play games 24 hours a day but in a society where even married couples need to maintain two full time jobs to pay for children it is impossible to monitor a child 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Having a law in place to prevent a merchant from selling a gun, cigarettes, alcohol, pornography, etc. to an unaccompanied minor is not a bad thing. We can rant about society not having the right to infringe on our rights (and this is in no way censorship – it seems only people who have never lived in a truly censored society throw that word around very easily) but when a child kills, rapes, or maims someone and is let off with an incredibly light sentence solely because they are underage, that is a societal problem that needs a societal solution. Quit bitching. If you think your kids are old enough to handle and process violent games responsibly then go to the store and buy it for them. I would much prefer for my children, however, that until they are of a majority and are responsible for themselves, that they will not be freely sold such material by clerks who are barely 18 themselves.

    And no, I have nothing against violent games/comics (in general – I do hate some specific ones). I just re-read my set of Johnny the Homicidal Maniac comics (a little juvenile in storytelling, I’ve found, ten years later). If my little sister, over 18, wanted to borrow them, fine. But I would not leave them out in my house where a 10 year old could find them.

    Seriously – find a REAL violation of rights to complain about.

  • kylemac

    Oh, and you do know that the CCA did not severely hinder the art, right? If you wanted your book to be kid friendly/CCA-approved, you had to follow certain guidelines. If you didn’t follow those guidelines you didn’t get CCA approval. You could still write your book. Life is about choices – we seem to be in a generation where we get 100% of what we want without sacrifices and whine like little babies when it’s not the case – but this is reality. You either conform to CCA and reach a large audience (which may or may not involve removing things like gruesome disembowlings from your work – heavens forbid!) OR you don’t conform to the CCA, include the disemboweling, but reach a smaller audience.

    There is no censorship here, just misguided entitlement.

  • bishopneo

    Wait… seriously? You think it’s up to the government to tell you what your kids should and shouldn’t be able to do, watch, say, think? Suck it up and be a real freaking parent. People that use the excuse that “both parent’s have to work” are just lazy. Shirking your responsibility of teaching your kids what’s right and whats wrong is what has this world screwed up to the degree it is.

    As yes, this is censorship. Any time anyone tells you that you aren’t allowed to do or say something it’s censorship. What would you consider a real violation? Does running a stop sign count as a ‘reall traffic violation’. I feel sorry for your kids in the future.

  • Amedeus

    It’s almost touching how everyone’s banding together from all the other industries to fight this thing. I’m glad everyone’s together on this.