comScore
Uncategorized Monday, February 13th 2012 at 12:25 pm

MIT Unveils Free Online Class, is This the Future of Higher Education?

Renowned as a premiere institute of higher learning for the sundry sciences, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology announced a new program that will bring a free version of one of its classes online. The program is called MITx, and the first of its fully automated courses kicks off this fall with 6.002x Circuits and Electronics. In addition to no costs, there are no prerequisites, anyone anywhere can sign up, and will receive a certificate upon completion. Seems like everyone is giving away university courses these days, huh?

As readers will recall, Stanford kicked off the trend for free online learning from major institutions last year with its free A.I. course taught by Sebastian Thrun. The course was, by all accounts, an overwhelming success. So much so that Thrun announced he was leaving Stanford and founding his own free online learning initiative called Udacity, which has quadrupled the number of classes since we last wrote about them.

The MITx program seems to differ from the Stanford course in some important ways. For instance, while the Stanford course was a basic, fundamental course, the MITx class is the most basic of the basic. According to the course’s professor Anant Agarwal, 6.002x is the foundation for many MIT students and transitions them from physics to electronic engineering. It also features chainsaws. No, really:

Secondly, the MITx course seems to shirk Stanford’s embracing of existing community sites like Reddit and seems to be rolling its own open source software. This is a particularly interesting move, since it could someday become the foundation for a larger scale online learning initiative.  Agarwal is quoted in an MIT press release from MITx’s announcement as saying:

“Creating an open learning infrastructure will enable other communities of developers to contribute to it, thereby making it self-sustaining,” [...] “An open infrastructure will facilitate research on learning technologies and also enable learning content to be easily portable to other educational platforms that will develop. In this way the infrastructure will improve continuously as it is used and adapted.”

While there is certainly a component of altruism in these efforts — lots of talk of bringing education to the world — there are other forces at work. For instance, for-profit universities have owned online learning for some time. Big names like Stanford and MIT entering the same sphere undercuts these (sometimes shifty and low-quality) institutions and could serve as a foothold for later paid online learning by major universities.

There’s also a growing complaint that higher education in America is becoming less and less about producing quality academics than it is simply giving students the basic skills to stand a chance in an increasingly competitive job market. Colleges risk becoming like the for-profit degree farms that they abhor, simply churning students through to stay afloat. However, if basic classes like 6.002x can be provided for free, this could take the onus off universities to provide basic education so they can focus more on high academia and research.

Those are just speculative points, however. No doubt the largest driving force behind the Stanford, MITx, and Udacity projects is a genuine desire on the part of a few passionate professors to harness new tools for new ways of learning. But that doesn’t mean we’re not witnessing a real sea change in how education is handled. Hold on to your hats, folks.

(via BBC, MIT, image via Wikipedia)

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • Bkd9

    The Stanford version of MITx is called Coursera, and features at least one professor from another institution.

  • Anonymous

    Google’s era under Eric Schmidt had involved into multiple crimes in Stanford which is fascism by nature.

    Google’s Eric Schmidt had abused google resources to financially and politicially support a criminal suspect named Gabriele Scheler, along with a Stanford Computer Science faculty Sebastian Thrun, against ruling from Stanford and police authorities. During their fight with Stanford, Eric Schmidt’s side had murdered an innocent Stanford student May Zhou in 2007 to threaten me and to terrorize Stanford. When they found I would not compromise a bit but actively tried to clarify the case, Eric Schmidt’s side did plot a murder on me as well. The only reason they didn’t make it a reality is becaue they were closely watched by police and they are afraid of leaving evidence (not becasuse they have any mercy on me as a human being, fascism by nature.) Eric Schmidt lost his CEO position because of his involvment into these crimes.

    These accusations stand still which Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun dare never deny to the public. Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun had not paid for their crimes

  • Anonymous

    This is actually a war between fascism and anti-fascism. At this stage, fascism still prevail in our lives. Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun are just two forefront people we can see in this fascism circle. There are whole pack of fascists behind them.
    Anyway, Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun’s names are not clear in Stanford Student May Zhou’s death, as well as their conspiracies on my life at later time, and neither Eric Schmidt nor Sebastian Thrun dare publicly deny his involvment into such crimes. But without clarification of this case, the criminal suspect side had committed more and more retaliatory crimes on victims. Can anyone deny this fact?

  • Anonymous

    For Sebastian Thrun’s side, you don’t want to threaten another person’s life with the death of student from your own school. You don’t want to terrorize your school boss with the killing of student from your own school. That’s absolutely unforgivable. You never feel regret of what your side had done, and that make it even more unforgivable of you.