1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

Movie Theaters Are Leaving 3D Lenses on for 2D Movies, and It’s Making Them Worse

by Robert Quigley | 9:16 am, May 23rd, 2011

Believe it or not, it’s possible for the mere presence of 3D movies in theaters to make the more numerous 2D offerings look worse. According to a very good investigative report from The Boston Globe, it’s relatively common practice for theaters that use Sony’s 4K digital projectors, which need an additional 3D lens in front of the regular lens when 3D movies are playing to allow for the polarization effect that makes the 3D image possible, to simply leave the 3D lenses in place when playing 2D fare through the same projector.The result, which the article says affects Regal, AMC, and National Amusements theaters: A dramatically darker picture, sapped of color.

So why aren’t theater personnel simply removing the 3-D lenses? The answer is that it takes time, it costs money, and it requires technical know-how above the level of the average multiplex employee. James Bond, a Chicago-based projection guru who serves as technical expert for Roger Ebert’s Ebertfest, said issues with the Sonys are more than mechanical. Opening the projector alone involves security clearances and Internet passwords, “and if you don’t do it right, the machine will shut down on you.’’ The result, in his view, is that often the lens change isn’t made and “audiences are getting shortchanged.’’

Even more insidiously, some movie theater employees say that this isn’t just a matter of oppressive DRM stumping projectionists, but that it’s official, albeit unspoken, policy to leave the dimming 3D lenses in place for 2D films: Said one, “If we knew a house would be opening ‘Harry Potter’ and it wasn’t going to be 3-D … I would ask them to swap the lens out and it would either go nowhere or come back with a negative from the regional technician, usually with the impression that it came from above.’’

(Boston.com via Boing Boing)

  • Citizen

     More of a reason to not go to the movies. Cheaper, better food at home. No noisy biatches playing with their cell phones. Better picture and sound. Pause, rewind. Couch is more comfortable. Smells better. The list goes on and on.

    Why do people still go to the movies?

  • http://www.facebook.com/amedeus8 Nick Gotshall

    Man, the things James Bond has to stoop to to make ends meet after MGM’s financial problems.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_5XSO2C3FE7I3INVFD4AADWYZ5A gjhtryre gfhtery

    Your satisfaction is our eternal pursuit.HTTP://WWW VOGUECATCH COMWe specialized in the exportation of sport shoes and other products(clothing, bag,sunglasses,watches,belts,etc )which have great enjoyed popularty in the world market Many of our goods are on sales ,we can guarantee the crediblity by Pay-pal and delivery time .we would like to make a long termship.1)Name : The perfect gift.2)Grade : AAA+3)Package : in original boxes4)Color : various5)MOQ : 1 pc6)Payment : Pay-pal/Western Union / Credit card7)Ship-ping : 4-7 days with guarantee of customs clearance, drop shipp-ing is accepted to customers’ demands.8)Who-lesale: very low price, you can make a small order first to test quality and service.HTTP://WWW  VOGUECATCH.COM

  • Dysperdis

    I stick to the local drive-in, myself– they’re cheap, usually have something good playing, and they don’t play 3-D movies.

  • dan

    Why not just dedicate some rooms to 3D movies only and the rest to 2D movies only? You won’t ever need to remove the 3D lenses.


Abrams Media Network click here for advertising opportunities

© 2012 Geekosystem, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram