comScore
Uncategorized Tuesday, October 9th 2012 at 2:05 pm

Room for One More? Mythbusters Prove Leonardo DiCaprio Could Fit On the Raft In Titanic

The ending of the movie Titanic has been a cinematic bone of contention for the ages. Relationships have been shattered and children disowned as a result of the senseless bickering between the two camps —  folks who take Cameron at his word that the wardrobe door could not have preserved the lives of both star-crossed lovers, and other people (yours truly included) who have always believed that there was pretty clearly room for two people, and the whole ending was a piece of idiocy that ruined an otherwise excellent film. Thanks to the Mythbusters crew, we can now shorten the title of the second camp — you can just refer to us as “the people who were right.” Want proof that both Jack and Rose could have lived to see another day, bet married, and probably grow sick of one another in due time? Let’s go to the tape.

In news that was no doubt met with several billion delighted shouts of “Ha! I told you so!” and an equal number of incredulous questionings of data, Adam Savage and Jaime Hyneman determined that Jack and Rose could have both survived on the floating platform at the end of Titanic with just one simple fix — attaching the life jacket Rose is wearing to the bottom of the board. Moving the life jacket off of Rose — who clearly doesn’t need it because she is not in the water — and spreading its buoyancy around the makeshift raft would have rendered the raft seaworthy enough to keep both lovers alive until they could be rescued.

If this were anywhere but the Internet, this would mean a cessation of discussion regarding the film’s ending. Since this is the Internet, though, infighting will continue, because the Internet runs off strongly held beliefs about inconsequential things and arguments in which there is now a real clear winner, and those things are like high-octane superfuel for the Internet, without which it would wither and die.

For many of us, though, it is time for a victory lap. I have complained about this ending to everyone who would listen and a few people who did their level best not to for the last 15 years, and I’m not alone. Granted, the solution is a little more creative than many of us had gotten in our explanations, but that just goes to show that if you are ever faced with a life threatening hypothermia scenario, your last few minutes on Earth would probably be better spent looking for engineering solutions to the problem of you dying instead of looking all moony-eyed at the girl you’re trying to save. That’s noble, yes, but it’s not entirely clever or pragmatic.

In other news, like a billion people owe me drinks over this. I’m happy to start collecting any time.

(via Indiewire, video courtesy of Discovery Channel)

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • Daniel

    As excited as I was for a new episode, I call shenanigans for a few reasons:

    1. Adam and Jamie did the final test themselves, rather than with size-appropriate stand-ins. While I know they like a hands-on approach, this meant that they had to use a door with added buoyancy, to counteract their larger masses. While I’m sure they did the math right, it calls the test into question. And besides, they couldn’t find a pair of vaguely anorexic, wannabe actors to stand in as Jack and Rose? They live in Southern California, those should be a dime a dozen!

    2. They didn’t do the test in freezing water (obviously). But fine motor control is one of the first things to go when your body is freezing to death–while it’s not overly complicated to strap a life vest to the underside of a door, would it be possible to do so with frozen fingers?

    3. Another thing to be lost in freezing conditions is higher brain function–would someone who is freezing to death even be able to come up with a clever idea?

    4. Finally, while they claim they’ve proven that Jack and Rose could’ve survived on that door together, in actuality, they disproved it, because they couldn’t get both of them on until they changed the scenario by tying the life vest under the door. But they were supposed to be testing what actually happened in the movie: Jack tried to climb on, but they couldn’t float with both of them, so Jack died. This was exactly what happened to Adam and Jamie.

    What they tested something completely different, something that didn’t happen in the movie (but that they thought should have happened). It’s like saying “They should have just gotten onto a lifeboat, then they both would have survived! This movie is so unrealistic!” or “They shouldn’t have gotten onto the Titanic in the first place, then they both would have survived! This movie is so unrealistic!” While those hypothetical statements may true, they’re not what we were shown in the movie. Characters in movies make certain choices–some good, some bad–and the consequences of those choices should be realistic. The audience has an expectation that those consequences conform to reality (or to the reality of the movie) but expecting characters in fiction to only make the wisest, most sensible choices will narrow your movie choices to almost nothing–and the ones that are left will be pretty boring.

    Also, you misspelled Jamie.

  • Stealthnugget

    Eh, How It Should Have Ended already answered this pretty well. “I’ll never let go…” And Daniel, you rock.