comScore
Uncategorized Friday, September 7th 2012 at 7:35 pm

Sea Otters To Save World From Environmental Collapse

Otters are good for much more than just making people go “Awwwwww” at aquariums across the world. Given enough time, the clowns of the sea could save the worlds from global warming, and all they have to do is what comes naturally — keep eating sea urchins. Which they do with their adorable hands, like they think they’re people!

How it works is this. Climate change is exacerbated by greenhouse gas emissions that come from pretty much everything cool that humans from driving cars to operating power plants to farming cattle. Kelp beds where otters hang out are some of the most efficient CO2 absorbers known to man — they are, as it were, super-effective! But sea urchins love to eat some kelp bed.

This is where otters come in, because otters, in turn love to eat them some sea urchins, preferably while frollicking delightfully in thriving kelp beds. So, let’s follow along —  more otters means less urchins means more healthy kelp beds means less CO2. According to researchers at the University of California, Santa Cruz published in the journal Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, that simple equation could prove the key to keeping CO2 in kelp beds, where it has less chance to destroy the world.

It’s not a ton of help, ultimately, but considering the greenhouse gas emissions mess we’re in — and how much worse it could get — man, we’ll take any help we can get.

(via Science Daily)

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • http://www.facebook.com/paul.pardee Paul Pardee

    So… what about the global warming that happened before people started burning fossil fuels? Will otters be able to stop that completely unrelated warming from happening?

    More otters means more kelp means less CO2 means less robust food crops means starving children in Africa. So if you drive a hybrid you must hate black children… or otters… Heck, or both!

  • Norman Styles

    Do you think that if every person on the Titanic stood on the deck and blew at the iceburg, disaster would have been averted? Then you probably also believe anthropogenic climate change can be stopped by a handful of otters eating sea urchins.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002218261231 Liam Gale

    If you actually read the entire article you would have seen that they ended it with ” it’s not a ton of help, ultimately, but considering the greenhouse gas emissions mess we’re in — and how much worse it could get — man, we’ll take any help we can get.”

  • coeli

    is this an article, or an entry in a 15 year old girl’s diary?

  • joe

    don’t you mean, “man, we’ll take any KELP we can get”?

  • Anonymous

    I’m with coeli on this one. Horrible writing. Surely this isn’t an actual “article?”

  • Anonymous

    What the media does not report because of the self serving green scientists is that nature will take care of the problem if we let it. There are organisms that thrive in the ocean on a very large scale that convert CO2 into oxygen and the warming trend tends to increase their numbers much like the algae in fresh water increases when the weather is warmer and they convert CO2 into oxygen on a large scale as well.
    Recent data also says that there will not be mass extinction which many people believe will happen instead most species will survive warming which they have done down through the ages. If you take a serious look around you right now do you see anything dying off because of the increased heat? No. They may be changing their habits but they do that to survive. Humans only add to the problem not cause it.

  • Anonymous

    You must be referring to the 98+% of greenhouse gasses that humans did not put up into space. Maybe the dinosaurs and cavemen liked to eat otters.

  • Anonymous

    plants… the organism you’re looking for is plants.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/James-Wallace/100004205761897 James Wallace

    All you who are home-schooled by evangelicals or Texas-educated: please stop sharing your ill-informed opinions on science topics.

  • Corey Tan

    You otter just be thankful and
    leave it at that

  • bobbylou

    And I love to eat me somes Otter!

  • idiotauthor

    What boggles my mind is that this is somehow good enough to make it the top story on the science section of Google News. Any person of at least slight intelligence knows that all plant life is a CO2 sink. They also know ecological carrying capacity basics. Otters will eat urchins, the otter population will grow and the kelp population will grow while urchins decrease. Then otters start starving, the urchins rebound and the kelp goes down. This “news story” is inane.

  • pig face

    Brilliant: reading about otters for no other reason than that they’re otters.

  • Anonymous

    Unfortunately; the kelp beds are close to the coast and industrial pollution in killing the otters. Man: can’t live with it, can’t compromise with it either.

  • H2o go!

    With increased heat comes global warming and rising sea levels. Increased heat also depletes glacier caps that feed many of the worlds rivers and provide freshwater to the majority of the worlds population. Without access to fresh drinking water we have and willmcontinue to have water accessibility issues around the world. Global warming also contributes to drought. I think you are starting to understand that this is not mass extinction but rather the slowed portion of nessicary resources vital to our life on this planet. So unless we can’t adapt faster to a life without H2O, at a rate greater than our depletion of H2O we are screwed. Watch water become a commodity over the next century!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Richard-L-Sanders/1313133183 Richard L Sanders

    Can you say “tongue in cheek, boys and girls? And the otters are always appealing.

  • jerry

    author needs to go to grammer school!

  • jon

    or perhaps grammar school you moron

  • shadowmia

    go Otters! go Otters! Yay!!!

  • Chris

    had to read, re-read, ponder who could write so poorly and maintain a job as a writer… then re-re-read. Finally came to the conclusion that this was a non-story and saw that most of the comments agree. So I added mine :P

  • Anonymous

    You are correct in stating that water will become a commodity but you have to remember that although the water in the form of ice might disappear but it will not go away. Since water is the most abundant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere the water there will fall to earth in the form of rain or even snow and keep the water flowing but in the process the drier areas, deserts, will expand and in time the water that is in the ice caps will be restored. It is these cycles that have replenished the earth since its birth.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001755671932 Robert Moffett

    My Sea otter not only saves the world by eating sea urchins but alo campaigns for less immigration to the USA which will reduce the USA population growth which has grown mostly via immigraion by 100 million in the last 40 years and is on track to reach a half a billion USA consumers via immigration for no good reason at all in the next few decades.
    Go! Sea otters! Go!!!

  • hemp_advocate

    grow hemp, sucks up CO2 like a straw.

  • Ashley Burke

    Lol, this made me laugh. “that come from pretty much everything cool…” hahahahahaahhaha This is awesome

  • anastomosis

    Your understanding of current climate science is faulty. CO2 is currently over 390 ppm – prior to the industrial revolution this concentration was around 270 ppm. Any reduction in CO2 by kelp beds is overshadowed by the 30+ gigatons per year global emission of CO2 and the effects of other greenhouse gases. Not only that, but over 40% of atmospheric CO2 is absorbed by the ocean. Carbonate chemistry in the ocean quickly dissociates said CO2 into bicarbonate (HCO3-), carbonate, and hydrogen ions (H+) which are acidic. So if you drive a gas-guzzler or wastefully use energy you must hate shellfish, coral reefs, and the coastal cities and island nations that rely on them. Also, don’t forget about the calcareous (calcium carbonate-forming) plankton (phyto and zoo) that help deliver carbon to the ocean depths. Also, otters are ‘keystone predators’ which help maintain biodiversity. If kelp beds were removed by sea urchins, they would be replaced with mats of algae that lower biodiversity (which may affect food webs in surrounding areas).

  • William

    It does sound like a 15 y.o.’s diary.. I dont know – I liked it..

    “man, we’ll take any ‘KELP’ we can get.” hahahhaah… good one!

  • blacky9er

    you comment-tators must be short guys with Napoleon complex.It’s a funny story with cool sea creatures. Of course you’d probably go and shoot them if you ever could get your ass out of your office chair and actually see the trees for the forest. What do you work for some bank and are afraid of getting the hair gel washed out of your hair from a few sprinkles of rain?

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/EHIK7UCP3EZ2S4U63U3XDUK2TQ Jim

    Unfortunately otters also eat abalone and crabs.

  • mans

    Earth has it’s own life cycle, like us humans and animals …..
    Questions
    Can we stop the rain NO
    can we stop earthquakes NO
    can we stop hurricanes NO
    can we stop the rotation of the Earth NO
    can we stop sunrise No
    can we stop sunset NO
    Can we stop the tide NO
    Can we stop the seasons No
    can we stop people from dying NO
    Can we stop thunder and lightning NO
    Can we stop volcano’s erupting or subsiding No
    And many other natural ……
    Earth has it’s own life cycle it going to continue on it’s own journey, Nothing we can do or not do to stop it or prevent it from happening.
    Asphalt paved roads contribute a chunk of heat to the atmosphere (research by Saitama university Japan 1990 1991)
    Every thing man make will eventually be decomposed and consumed by earth. Like us humans after death and all living entities.
    One thing that we might be doing is expediting Earth’s life cycle.
    It WAS GLOBAL WARMING and now CLIMATE CHANGE (make up your mind) that is exactly what it is EARTH”S LIFE CYCLE no one can prevent it.
    Enjoy what natures offers, live life to the fullest and dye in peace.

  • blacky9er

    Must be ITEL engineers or something and haven’t seen the sun in 45 days.Do ya’ll Need a FOX 12 rain forecast to figure out what to wear?

  • anastomosis

    Eutrophication – that is what happens when algae blooms on a large scale in both fresh water and in the ocean. This creates anoxic (NO oxygen) water due to large dieoffs of algal cells. In bloom circumstances, cells are dying off at nearly the same rates that they are dividing. Dead cells are rapidly decomposed by bacteria, which respire – consuming oxygen and releasing carbon dioxide. Bloom events only decrease CO2 levels if the dead cells can sink into the deep water masses, which rarely happens on the large scales necessary to decrease atmospheric CO2 concentrations. There are many species dying off right now – I’m not sure how hard you “looked around you” though (you ARE on a computer, connected to the internet tho, a simple google search could help maybe?). Gas is also less soluble in warmer water – so less oxygen will be able to stay in solution which may disproportionately impact organisms that can’t move or are dependent on currents. The changes we are responsible for are astounding: deforestation, oceanic impacts (bottom-trawling, overfishing, ocean acidification), climate change (carbon dioxide emissions, methane from fracking leaks and livestock overproduction), and pollution (plastics, wastewater from industry and municipalities, pesticides, Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals – affecting hormones, list goes on). The MSM has been under-reporting on these issues from the get-go. Your logic is off.

  • blacky9er

    PEEL OUT GOOBER!!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Billy-Williams/100002966421341 Billy Williams

    Carbonic acid is produced when Co2 contacts ocean water, but the saline ocean water is fairly basic(pH 8+). This will cause the H2CO3 to convert into carbonate and bicarbonate salts. This WILL affect the pH but the plants can absorb the carbonate salts and use them as photosynthesis fuel.
    So… Algae and Kelp are very good scrubbers of the ocean (not CO2). :) The spare Hydrogen ion bonds to the emitting O2 from the plants and BINGO!.. More water..

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Billy-Williams/100002966421341 Billy Williams

    volcanos

  • 1sfvcali

    All crap ,here’s your proof how many millions of years have sea urchins been growing and we are still all alive .Some people must come up with this crap to justify their jobs .Bad thing is some get payed by subsidized tax dollars claiming their scientist .Thats why we here soooo much about globule warming .hay where’s all the oil spill in gulf ? Same scientist said it would take 100years to clean it self up .6 months later all clean ask any one from the area.These so called scientist how come they never ever change the world .

  • George

    You need a copy desk editor who is not illiterate.

  • timmy

    “If you take a serious look around you right now do you see anything dying off because of the increased heat?” Polar Bears? Jackass

  • anastomosis

    can we stop blindly consuming resources at insanely greedy rates?? YES. Can we stop wasting energy, driving wasteful cars, and polluting the atmosphere with 34 Gtons of CO2 per year? Yes. I think you miss the point a lot of people are trying to make: this is our responsibility to do our part to reduce our impact. The US is disproportionately responsible for the CO2 concentration of this planet, and we as a nation (and all nations on this planet) need to step up and address what to change about our lifestyles. Change is inevitable, changing planet is natural – but we are exacerbating the problem far beyond nature’s capacities to buffer our actions. The Earth is a complex system, but one that is inextricably interconnected. Our actions have an effect and said effects have consequences for us. Responsibility is a hell of a thing. Change is the name of the game, and it’s coming to your way of life whether you like it or not. Welcome to life on planet earth! BTW – global warming generally refers to the increase in average global temperature, which was a predicted effect of climate change.

  • anastomosis

    I think what you are looking for here is the largest volume of water on the planet: the ocean. The water will end up in the ocean, which will result in rising sea levels and forced migrations of people inland. This will further stress already depleted water tables and aquifers. Look no further than the battle currently underway in TX, OH, and other areas over groundwater usage (agribiz vs. frackers). Rising sea levels are yet another impact of climate change, yet we keep on burnin business as usual.

  • http://www.facebook.com/michael.porcaro.3 Michael Porcaro

    could be a good thing ,lets have it for the otters

  • Astralwerk

    Douche brain must have missed the latest tar balls polluting the Gulf’s already compromised ecosystem. Go to your garage, turn on your gasoline horse and take a long nap…we won’t miss you. Promise!

  • Mike B

    Sir, your lack of understanding in the basic processes that support your own life is astounding. I thumb my nose at you sir.

  • LLanley

    Go do your homework

  • Mike B

    I second that~! best remedy is to get rid of your TV, it is not a tool of enlightenment, but deception.

  • Sota51

    Actually, many short lived plants will release the CO2 when they decompose. So the types of plant life that make ideal CO2 sinks are not as numerous as yoou imply. Plus, everyone likes otters.

  • Brian

    Also, the genius that wrote this never considered where kelp(and sea otters) lives, in cold oceans with an average annual surface temperature of no more than 57 F. Which rules out about 70 of the world’s oceans. What rubbish. The fact that this made it to the Google News page is exactly the problem with internet news.

  • Ryan Cole

    Prehistoric warming was a problem for the dinosaurs, not us. Clearly otters won’t stop it, but if they have an effect, the source is irrelevant.

    I was with you not long ago. Warming is a good thing. In of itself it generally is. But we must also take into account side effects such as extreme weather, weather pattern upset, ocean circulation upset, and ocean PH balance.

    Farming requires very consistent weather patterns. Obviously flooding and drought can ruin a crop, but also late frosts, high moisture, and early rains can be just as bad. It seems moisture in polar zones causes cold air to fling out more. An unfrozen polar ocean is not good.

    The oceans fisheries are current driven and fish (especially shellfish) are sensitive to PH and temperatures. What we do know is bad, and there is a lot we don’t know could be a lot worse.

    The cause only matters in what we can do to mitigate the problem. Sustainability is simply about survival.

  • Mike B

    correct, no one can PROVE it. .. but only because proof does not exist in scientific terms.
    We can however dis-prove every other option. Which is where the data is taking us.
    That climate is heating up and humans do effect that trend. this is not up for debate.
    Now.. how much and what to do about it and such those issues are open for debate..the process continues

  • Anonymous

    Well put! Is dye a typo or a suttle comment about the mark we all seem to leave upon passing?

  • motherhawk

    Live life to the fullest and dye in peace? I see this sentence so often. I always have an image of a happy but oblivious person dyeing their clothes in rose-colored hues. But to die in peace, one should feel as if they’ve left the world better than they found it. Sadly, Mother Nature left on her own would do fine and earth’s life cycle would not be a scary thing (unless you’re being eaten by a lion). It’s mans unique and horrifying contribution that is in play here.

  • motherhawk

    Yes, let’s paint all those self-serving scientists- 99.99% of the planet’s scientists- in a bad light. How are they self-serving, though? Because they, too, live on this planet and want to see it’s survival? Because they could make way more money stating the opposite and going on Fox News .

  • motherhawk

    To answer your question, death is happening now because of increased warming. In the last 35 years, land species have declined by 25%, marine life by 28% and freshwater species by 29%.

  • anastomosis

    The concept you illustrated is inaccurate. H2CO3 (carbonic acid) dissociates into bicarbonate and hydrogen ions (according to Le Chatelier’s principle). In a system with excess bicarbonate, carbonate and H+ dissociate. Bicarbonate, which is most common carbonate in ocean, can either accept or donate H+ to maintain equilibrium, BUT increased acidity results in the dissolution of CaCO3 (calcium carbonate) to maintain alkalinity (not much free carbonate in system to bond). Increased CO2 in atmosphere = increased carbonic acid, which drives Le Chatelier’s principle thus producing more bicarbonate and hydrogen ions. More H+ = more CaCO3 dissolution NOT water formation. Since pre-industrial times, hydrogen ion concentration in surface waters has increased by at least 30% (pH from 8.2 to below 8.1).

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/James-Wallace/100004205761897 James Wallace

    Golly you must be a Native American Indian who wasn’t killed off by smallpox-laden free blankets, or by Manifest Destiny!

  • mobby

    Ok..so after you morons read this you figured people actually cared to hear you whine,” like 15yr old girls”. I’m sure you whine asses also have facebook too to go along with your girly side..STFU!!!!

  • Anonymous

    Please write your beliefs in a diary and give it to your family so that when you’ve been dead for several generations and your descendants are suffering through the effects of climate change, they know who to blame.

  • ChrisM

    wow. this article is pathetic. humans are screwed, but otters will probably live on. the collapse is inevitable, humans are way past earth’s carrying capacity.

  • cheetos101

    Anybody ever eat otter?

  • Anonymous

    This is like throwing quarters at a charging bull…
    and a complete insult to intelligence. If combined with a complete reversal of industry for Big Oil, and a global drive to create free, clean energy, complete ban on ocean fishing, trawling, and all dumping, it might make a difference. But by itself, this (in the words of Rip Torn) is about as useful as a poopie-flavored popsicle.

  • Anonymous

    You felt the need to comment… and an unintelligent comment at that.

    What does that say about you?

  • mobby

    You truly are a loser…

  • rjgermann

    When one takes into consideration the methane release from increased otter flatulence and excrement.. and the CO2 release from the decay of the additional millions of dead sea urchin shells.. there is probably no net gain in CO2 absorption by the increase in kelp population within the ecosystem.. yawn..

  • biostudent

    the shells from the sea urchins as carbonate and the kelp as the cellulose be a double carbon sink. the more urchins eaten = the more empty shells, and more room for new urchins. what a nice system

  • Anonymous

    At least I believe what I can figure out for myself instead of taking what others say as fact. Whenever you are looking at global warming you have to consider the whole picture instead of the likes of Al Gore who only presented one part of it. This earth has been through several period of global warming and ice ages and will continue to do so as long as it exists. Humans have not caused this to happen they have only added to it. Yes the earth is warming and we have helped it out but just how much do you know of facts about this earth. How much CO2 does it generate on it’s own? Compare that to how much we produce. You will find that the earth is as much to blame or more so than we humans.
    What about all that oil that was spilled into the Gulf? Where is all of it. They found out that there are life forms out there that consumed most of it already and cleaned up the mess. It is not washing up on shore considering that as much as spilled should be doing and life in the Gulf was not destroyed as believed. What about those facts.

  • Anonymous

    Yes that’s true but if the earth generates its’ own global warming don’t you think that would have happened anyway? Who do you blame for that?

  • Anonymous

    An expected response from a less-than-adequate thinker.

  • Anonymous

    Your thinking scares me. Not because you don’t put your thought together in a well presented manner, but because the thought is so blatantly ignorant. Your “awww, to hell with it” attitude is what keeps this planet in decline.

  • mobby

    Shut up jack ass…your a douche!! With the bag

  • Anonymous

    Trolls are so annoying. Go play in traffic.

  • boot

    So the sea otters eat the kelp, which stores CO2. What happens when those hydrocarbon bonds are broken down by the sea otter so it capture energy? CO2 is released via respiration and the breakdown of waste produced by the otters. Not to mention there are probably more cars in the world than there are sea otters, so what difference does this make? This is either bad journalism or poor scientific research. I’m betting on the former.

  • Anonymous

    1) CO2 is plant food, that’s correct.
    2) Co2 does NOT warm the climate. “Greenhouse” gases do NOT exist. Our basic planetary temperature is caused by gravity compressing the atmosphere which is then influenced by variable solar input, related cloud-cover changes, and ocean current cycles.
    3) “Climate change” (aka global warming) stopped in 1995, with a couple of warm months in 1998. It is the absence of warming that necessitated the change of brand name.
    4) There is absolutely NO defensible scientific evidence to support the manmade global warming claims.
    5) So, why do they make these claims?
    It’s a political agenda to create a (false) crisis to convince the public to acquiesce to a Draconian usurption of freedoms, rights, and wealth with the goal of creating a one-world government which would have to be totalitarian and communist. It’s not a conspiracy if its been published. It’s called the UN’s Agenda 21.

  • Man of REASON

    HERE IS THE REAL PROBLEM, people CAN NOT agree on ANYTHING, so much time is wasted bickering on Minusha that nothing gets done. Can anyone just Think to themselfs That if they do not agree, the. Issue at hand is not going to do harm on a large scale so LET IT BE, spend the time you saved comming up with a better solution !

  • kakapo

    This is the greatest insult to intelligence and humanity I have heart in a long time.

    First of all, CO2 DOES MATTER. Let me explain to you what happens when Sun’s short wave radiation enters earth… it is reflected, scattered and absorbed to a huge amount. A significant part of this radiation is absorbed by the Earth’s surface and Reemitted back as long wave radiation.

    Now here come the GREENHOUSE gases. They absorb the long wave radiation and keep it in the atmosphere for a longer period of time. We need them, otherwise Earth would be 34°C+ colder.

    However, the problem is that we have more and more CO2 in the atmosphere, already more than in the last 650.000 years. You can argue that the amount of CO2 was even higher in the part, but you cannot just ignore the fact that there has never before been such an exponential increase in CO2 than we do have now, PLUS it all started just after the industrial revolution… well what a coincidence is that? The next great warming period just starts after inventing the steam engine.

    This is all textbook, taught at every serious university and I am very curious where you got your climate education.

    Despite, Global Warming or not, I really do not care if the world will be destroyed by 4 more degrees of temperature or other forces. I don’t know if the sea otters will save us.

    What I do know is that our world is changing, our environment is changing and not for good. Species die, people die and starve because deserts spread and water runs short. They are being exploited for our wealth, they fight civil wars about the raw materials that are used to produce our smartphones. And we have to give everything to end this.

    The solution to stopping this mass extinction event and spiral of destruction is the same to what people believe would be the solution to stopping climate change: Be more efficient in what you do, and stop wasting resources.

    You can make this explanation more complicated if you want, but if you break it down to the essentials it is exactly what I just said: We have been living over the top for such a long time, and if everybody was living like us it would take 5 more planets to maintain our society. You know how many litres of water it takes to produce a hamburger? 2.500. Think about it.

    We can be so damn lucky that we grew up with such a wealth, so much food and water. And education. Those are luxuries, and you should be happy for them.

    And now here you are, sharing you ignorance and selfishness, telling me and everyone else in this world that there is no such thing as climate change, while the only thing you are actually telling us is that you don’t care! You just don’t care about what is wrong with this world.

    You want to stay in you nice little perfect sphere full of Pickup trucks wasting 30 litres per 100 km, hamburgers and internet in your pocket, without caring that your wealth is actually paid with blood, lives and destruction in the developing countries.

    Shame on you.