comScore
Uncategorized Tuesday, October 4th 2011 at 1:16 pm

Patent Troll Claims To Hold Patent For Wi-Fi, Sues People Left and Right

Alleged patent troll Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC has decided that one of its (presumably many) patent portfolios is for Wi-Fi in general. As such, it has begun to sue companies left and right as patent trolls are wont to do. So far, the suits have largely been against restaurants, coffee shops, and department stores including Caribou CoffeeCosí and Panera Bread. In an attempt to freshen up the patent trolling process, it seems that Innovatio is asking for comparatively tiny settlements of between $2000 and $5000 to make the option of going to court seem extra expensive.

At this point you’re probably thinking “wait a minute, but I use Wi-Fi.” Rest assured, Innovatio has no intentions of going after your wallet you…yet. In an interview, Matthew McAndrews, lead litigator for Innovatio lawsuits said “Innovatio has made a strategic and business judgment at this stage that it doesn’t intend to pursue [lawsuits on the basis of] residential use of WiFi.” He also made a point of mentioning that “This is not a seat-of-the-pants, fly-by-night shakedown.” The lawyer doth protest too much, methinks.

By now, you probably know all about how patent trolling works but what makes this scenario a little bit different is the size of the settlements and the pervasiveness of the technology, two variables that go hand in hand. The fact that almost everyone uses Wi-Fi means that Innovatio has no shortage of available targets and the low cost of settlement makes fighting a hard choice to make. That’s all well and good for Innovatio because almost everyone has a stake in this particular fight and everyone is a lot of people if you manage to get them all riled up.

Innovatio’s latest campaign has been to start taking on hotels, including the Hyatt Corporation, Marriott Hotels, Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Ramada Inn, Best Western, Days Inn, Super 8 Hotels, Travelodge, and many, many more. In retalition, two companies that hold Wi-Fi usage near and dear –Motorola and Cisco– have filed a complaint requesting that the Innovatio patents be declared invalid. Innovatio does not produce or sell anything and therefore, its patents aren’t really protecting anything, as patents are designed to do. Of course, if that arguement actually worked, patent trolling would be over by now. Still, the fact that Wi-Fi is so ubiquitous could finally tip the scales. This is a pretty lucrative cash-grab for Innovatio –whatever their motives may actually be– but it’s at the cost of angering a huge nest of hornets.

(via The Patent Examiner)

Relevant to your interests

 

 

Filed Under |
  • Anonymous

    I honestly don’t understand how patent law could get so watered down that these schmucks could use it to make a single dime.  I hope this gets the issue into the court system in such a way that patent trolls will get shut down permanently.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=688089381 JayCee Panderp

    As usual, the patent system is just a joke.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Yahvision-Rowles/100001876542816 Yahvision Rowles

    If this company own the patent for this tech, then they have all the right in the world to do just what there doing.  Just like if someone stole your property and started using it, would’nt that be illegal.  Same thing!   YAHVISION!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Yahvision-Rowles/100001876542816 Yahvision Rowles

    The patent law is suppose to protect ones patent property,  just like the police protects your property.  If someone stole your car, would you not want the law to get it back for you or at least pay you for it.  Same thing!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Yahvision-Rowles/100001876542816 Yahvision Rowles

    If it there property than they should have every right to sue, just like if someone stole from you would you not want to get what was stolen from you back are at the very least get paid for it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=691947096 Steven Jeffries

    Patents do not get any claims what so ever over how anyone uses the technology, whether they like it or not. Such a patent would not only be a bad business model, but the company would likely end up going under very swiftly. Patents only, and I mean only protect anyone from copying that design. Kind of like someone making an exact duplicate of Apple’s iPhone and selling it. It doesn’t and will never cover how such technology is used. I’m actually looking into what they’re claiming is an infringement, even though it seems they’re claiming the use of the technology is the infringement (which is nothing that can truly be claimed.)

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=691947096 Steven Jeffries

    The use of the technology cannot be claimed on a patent regardless of whether they like it or not. Pure and simple, they should have no claim, and I’d have the judge fired over such that dictated that they have that right, when they actually don’t.

  • Anonymous

    But these people did not create this system.  Have you seen some of the vague patents that are approved?  And they know they cannot prove they own this technology, but they can make it less expensive to settle than to fight the good fight.  It’s criminal.

  • Ryan Tracey

    I thought CSIRO invented wi-fi.