comScore
Uncategorized Saturday, October 27th 2012 at 12:00 pm

A ‘Penis Worm’ Overturns Evolution Theory, Scientific Naming Processes

A new study of priapulids, commonly referred to as “penis worms,” may have just unraveled a large part of what scientists have believed about evolutionary history. The priapulid belongs is a member of the protostome family, a sub-set of living species defined by the fact that they develop a mouth and anus as embryos. After doing some genetic testing, it seems that priapulids don’t actually do this, which means the whole group will need to be redefined by other common traits.

The discovery may change the known evolutionary track of a large group of living things, including people. In terms of evolution, scientists classify species based on major traits at the embryonic level. One of the major classifying traits is whether a creature develops two openings (a mouth and an anus) as an embryo. Those species are separated into two groups: Protostomes, who get form a mouth first, and deuterostomes, who make their anus first. (Guess what? We’re the second one!) Until now, penis worms have been classified as a protosomes: According to this new data from the norwegian University of Bergen, however, they may have evolved from deuterostomes, just like us.

The key is one particular priapulid, Priapus caudatus, is genetically very close to the first “protosome” as we know about. If the penis worm developed an anus before it a mouth, then the protosome may not be reasonable way of classifying evolutionary progress. If that’s the case, scientists will have to re-name protosomes, and possibly re-classify certain species into other groups.

As of now, the Priapus caudatus, is simply a piece of outlying data: An exception to the rule. That said, it’s an exception to a rule scientists have sure of for a really long time, so it has the potential to change everything. Put it another way: Right at this moment, the penis worm is the most important species in the study of evolution.

(via Nature)

Relevant to Your Interests

 

Filed Under |
  • Ralph

    This is a taxonomy issue. Many large groups have had to be reclassified due to genetic testing demonstrating previous classification based on visual observation incorrect. It doesn’t actually “threaten” the theory of evolution at. I sincerely hope the author of this article is just ignorantly parroting another article with a sensationalist headline and/or message and isn’t trying to make such a bold and fundamentally baseless claim themselves. Either way it appears Geekosystem is fairly scientifically illiterate. I am not surprised.

  • Jordi

    I don’t want to sound mean, but really the author of this post didn’t understand the original paper.

    The study cited finds that priapulids develope the anus from the embryonic blastopore. So while from a evolutionary point of view they belong to Protostomia (classically defined as “animals that derive the mouth from the blastopore”), their development resembles to the one from members of Deuterostomia. Most likely, because the 2 groups inherited from a last common ancestor. This is the big finding, and really a nice achievement for which the authors deserve all the credit.

    However, this is not the first instance of a member of Protostomia with a embrionary development similar to a “deuterostomate”. This happens in chaetognaths, brachiopods, phoronids and probably bryozoans.

    Priapulids are still CORRECTLY classified as “Protostomates”, and the authors do not claim that they come from deuterostomates. We shall differentiate between the “grades of organization” (i.e. protostomate) used in the past to define groups and the evolutionary groups themselves (i.e. Protostomia). Nowadays we know that some of those definitions are not accurate.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Ironarjen Arjen ten Have

    So how does this “Overturn Evolution Theory”? This is a rather ridiculous title…..