comScore
Uncategorized Monday, January 23rd 2012 at 5:25 pm

Sebastian Thrun, Mastermind of Stanford’s Free AI Course, Forms Free Education Website

Researcher and professor Sebastian Thrun turned a lot of heads when he headed a bold experiment in online teaching at Stanford University by offering an artificial intelligence course for free. Of the 160,000 enrollees, 23,000 graduated the course with a Stanford University certificate and a head full of computer science knowledge. The experience of teaching a course on such a massive scale apparently left its mark on Thrun as well, who announced today at the Digital Life Design conference that he was leaving Stanford and was heading up a new free education project called Udacity.

Like the Stanford course, Udacity will be focused on computer science courses taught at the university level and free of charge. There are currently two courses available. The first, CS 101: Building a Search Engine, will require no previous knowledge of programming and aims to teach the fundamentals of computer science in seven weeks. It will be taught by Thrun and University of Virginia professor Dave Evans. The second course is a follow up to the Stanford AI course called CS 373: Programming a Robotic Car, and will certainly touch on Thrun’s passion of driverless vehicles.

The motivation to take free education to a new level was for Thrun a matter of true urgency. I Programmer quotes Thrun as having said:

Now that I saw the true power of education, there is no turning back. It’s like a drug. I won’t be able to teach 200 students again, in a conventional classroom setting.

And not just more people, but people of all walks of life and from all over the world. Moreover, Thrun believes that his online teaching techniques surpass interaction in a physical classroom. He points out that during the original Stanford course, his 200 person class dwindled to 30 people. Thrun said that this was a testament to the intimacy and success of online teaching, though it’s just as likely they preferred being able to sleep in.

Snarking aside, Thrun believes that his approach is a better way to teach. Felix Salmon with Reuters writes:

Thrun was eloquent on the subject of how he realized that he had been running “weeder” classes, designed to be tough and make students fail and make himself, the professor, look good. Going forwards, he said, he wanted to learn from Khan Academy and build courses designed to make as many students as possible succeed — by revisiting classes and tests as many times as necessary until they really master the material.

While Udacity certainly looks like a positive step forward for free online education, and for increasing the computer science knowledge base — something that our society badly needs — it lacks one thing that the Stanford course had: Name recognition. No doubt many people signed up for the Stanford class simply for the love of learning, but the promise of a certificate from a well known university was likely a major incentive as well.

Even though Thrun talks about reaching 500,000 students with his next course, he’s also espousing a fairly utopian view of education where the learners want to learn and the teachers want to teach. Conventional wisdom would have us believe that only small groups of passionate individuals could make that happen. Thrun has, however, already done the unthinkable with his Stanford course, and perhaps he will again.

(Udacity via Slashdot, Reuters, I Programmer, image via Wikipedia)

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • Fishy

    Utopian? Are you seriously suggesting that there are people studying computer sciences who don’t want to learn?

    If students didn’t want to learn, they wouldn’t be in higher education. Nobody forces them to go!

  • Anonymous

    Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper or your self-confidence. NOW is the correct time to study contact your local University also check for an interesting article called High Speed Universities on web

  • Mdeforge

    False. Can seriously not think of any reasons why?

  • PartyRuncis

    It’s not completly true because most of the students are studying for diploma paper wherever their high school grades can get them. So in our country its not about if you wanna be educated – It’s about doing what’s necessary for future.

    So yes, students are being forced to take education if they want to live normal life.

  • Anon

    Not a bad article, missed something though.

    > Thrun has, however, already did the unthinkable with his Stanford course, and perhaps he will again. 

    He already has did the unthinkable?

  • Anonymous

    The fact that Sebastian Thrun left Stanford is incredibly strange. I have some personal insight into the online classes going on at Stanford, and though Thrun has received more publicity I would say Andrew Ng is the leader of the initiative. Also, Thrun’s AI class may have been very popular with people taking it online, it was very poorly done within Stanford. It’s possible Thrun is starting this online university because his idea of his importance in what Stanford is doing with online classes is totally out of sync with that of the CS department.

  • Jim Sutton

    Your link to 400 additional online courses … doesn’t work.

  • Sunxofxnothing

    Meh…society has a lot of pressure on young people to go and pursue a higher education. Some students honestly don’t want to learn…some see it as an outlet to “party” or some are basically too worried to go against their parents will; thus causing them to enroll where their heart isn’t just to please where their heart is.

  • http://freeonlinecoursesfromtopuniversities.com/ Boyd Carter

    Sebastian Thrun is “a day late and a dollar short” when it comes to “free” courses at Stanford.  MIT’s MITx program wins hands-down when it comes to free courses with a certificate at the end of the course.

  • meshhat

    I think it lacks in more than just name recognition.  His original course really was just a data dump of content.  There really wasn’t much “design” to the course – no measurement of outcomes, no positive instructional delivery methods.  While it’s great people like this are willing to provide their content, I wouldn’t call it a course – more like a resource.