Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal One-Ups Anti-Equality Site

That’s friggin’ awesome. Best way of dealing with hotlinking I’ve encountered – subversion!

All men are created equal. Yep. Equally able to procreate with women, aside from illness-related concerns.

What some seem not to have realized is that unnatural actions are not part of one’s humanity. This is roughly analogous to marrying a dog – you can’t have kids, but hey, at least you can “express your commitment” to your fine furry friend, eh? ‘Cept that’s not what marriage is. Marriage has been since its inception a two-pronged institution: One for expressing the love one person has for another, and the other for giving the progeny of that union a stable, loving environment to grow up in so that they can have the best possible start in life. It is this latter which fuels marriage-related tax breaks etc. – and it is this later which non-heterosexual unions by nature lack. And if adoption is brought into the equation, perhaps the correct solution is to make adoption grounds for similar monetary support to that which childbearing currently receives.

So, by all means, go do your thing. I don’t care. Just don’t ask for money for raising your imaginary kids, don’t demand a pedestal alongside race and gender as “immutable human characteristics,” and don’t ask the local church to go against its beliefs to sanction your relationship. You are not the new minority. We are not the new racists. You are normal people with unusual pursuits, and it’s time you stopped trying to be more.

So wait… you’re saying that barren people (whether it be age or health related) shouldn’t be allowed to get married? I mean, that pairing wouldn’t be able to produce offspring and is therefore, by your idea of what marriage is, isn’t really a marriage. Or what about couples that never plan to have children? According to you, their marriage should be nixed as well. I mean, we wouldn’ t want couples who don’t add to the over-population problem that we’re facing around the world.. how selfish of them to not want to have children! I kind of am interested in knowing your opinion on those kinds of couples.. because they fall into the exact complaints you have about homosexual couples.

I also want to know how people can say “It’s the same as marrying a dog.” How in the world is marrying another human being in anyway equivlant to marrying a dog or any other kind of animal, really? They can’t exchange and express love, ideas, or even communicate in the same way another human being can. A ‘marriage’ with an animal would be one sided. Not saying animals aren’t capable of love and communication but not on the same scale that another human is. So love alone is not enough of a reason to want to be with someone? To some people marriage is because you love the other person, you want to be with them and no one else AND that’s what the other person wants too. I’d like to think that’s what marriage is. That’s what it is to me, that’s why I’m with who I’m with. I would break off my current engagement if I found out he was ‘expecting’ me to have children as if it was some civic duty as a married couple and I better hold up my end of the bargin by spitting out a kid or two. If that’s not what you meant, it’s what you said.

And ‘imaginary kids’ woah, really? Did you think about that before you wrote it. Are all adopted kids ‘imaginary kids’ or just the ones belonging to homosexual couples? Should I go to my grandmother and inform her. “You weren’t really Great-gran’s daugther.. just her ‘imaginary’ one since she didn’t actually birth you.” Or maybe I should go to my dad and tell him. “Well Grandma and Papoo don’t really count as your parents since they didn’t concive you, even though they raised you until you were three.”

And it is a prejuidce that belongs side race and gender as these people are being JUDGED for what they are. They’re not asking for unique rights, they’re asking for rights that any other citizen has. And don’t give me this bull about it being a ‘choice’. That’s such a load of crock. If it was a choice, I’d be a lesbian, I find I get along with women better and, because of how guys treated me growing up, don’t find it easy like a lot of guys. But nope.. my body decided I like men. So I’m annoyingly attracted to them, even though I don’t like a lot of them. That just meant I had to hunt a little harder for one I wanted to be with. There’s only one thing I agreed with that you said “don’t ask the local church to go against its beliefs to sanction your relationship” now if only we could get those churches to stay out of our business (and I’m not just talking about gay marriage). I’ve stopped asking for acceptence, I’m just asking for tolerance.

Except that A: There is no such thing as ‘unnatural’ – it simply does not exist – and B: Dogs =/= Humans.

Except that A: There is no such thing as ‘unnatural’ – it simply does not exist – and B: Dogs =/= Humans.