Sony Hiked Up the Price of Whitney Houston’s Music Less Than an Hour After Her Death
by Eric Limer | 2:47 pm, February 13th, 2012
In this age of rampant social media, death has gotten a bit complicated, especially for celebrities. Sometimes you’re reported dead before your time, and if you have passed, it’s only a matter of time — 30 seconds or so — before widespread, uncontained discussion begins. When it came to light this weekend that Whitney Houston had died, the predictable Twitter-splosion occurred, part an parcel with off-color jokes and heart-felt condolences, but something more calculatedly irreverent may have been bubbling up behind the scenes. Some are accusing Sony of initiating a price hike on one of Houston’s albums presumably in order to capitalize on the “free” publicity.
A mere 30 minutes after the announcement of Houston’s death became widespread, the price of her 2007 album “The Ultimate Collection” nearly doubled on iTunes from £4.99 ($7.87) to £7.99 ($12.61) as reported by Digital Spy. By Sunday evening, the album had dropped back to its original price. Initially, ire was directed at iTunes, but it has since been reported that the price change was caused by Sony who adjusted the wholesale price of the album causing iTunes to process an automatic adjustment.
What reason could Sony have for this adjustment besides trying to make bank on the singer’s death? Sony argues that it was all a mistake, and that the original price was inaccurate. According to Sony, Houston’s album had been under-priced for a while now, her death simply called attention to the mistake, which was promptly fixed. Even if this was the case — which there’s no hard evidence to suggest it wasn’t — it was a probably a mistake for Sony to do what they did. Regardless of the reason, it was going to wind up looking tasteless. Sony did eventually back down, dropping the price again, but that just raises more questions about what was actually going on in the first place.
Price-gouging or not, the price hike was certainly a misstep. Either way, the real question is whether Sony wasn’t thinking, or whether Sony just doesn’t care.
(via The Next Web)
-
Sebastien Trudel
-
Sebastian McNab
-
Anonymous
-
http://www.facebook.com/bucur.marian Marian Bucur
-
http://www.facebook.com/people/Jamie-Murphy/1788049486 Jamie Murphy
-
AMP2020
-
Anonymous
-
AIiveStiIIKickin
-
Anonymous
-
expatpatriot
-
http://www.facebook.com/people/Neil-Murphy/100000566621491 Neil Murphy
-
Anonymous
-
Love of Country
-
Anonymous
-
http://www.proactivepolitics.blogspot.com/ Norbit Peters
-
http://www.proactivepolitics.blogspot.com/ Norbit Peters
-
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OJ766ICBQDKEJY34J252S7J5CE Pat Mulligan
-
GuestWho
-
Kim34782974982
-
GuestWhat12
-
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003105863276 Political Dookie
-
Anonymous
-
Larry Braxton
-
http://www.facebook.com/people/Frank-Calderale/100003184080823 Frank Calderale














Eric Limer
Max
James Plafke
Rollin Bishop
Philosoraptor’s 50 Wisest Musings
There is a Beer That Tastes Like Bacon and Maple Syrup
The 65 Best Planking Pictures From Around the World
Here’s How to Play the Fully Functional Moog Synthesizer Google Doodle and Four Track Recorder
Did You Know Gaming? Website Provides Awesome Gaming Trivia






RSS