Your Fears About Hollywood Overreacting to Scott Pilgrim‘s Bad Box Office May Be Justified
by Robert Quigley | 9:29 am, August 17th
With a weekend box office of $10.5 million, Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, which cost about $60 million to make, had the alarmingly bad opening that fans feared it would. While a few (generally older) critics slammed it, it was really a stellar movie, and one needn’t have read the graphic novels it’s based on (I didn’t) to appreciate it.
There are plenty of theories as to why such a buzzed-about, well-marketed, solid movie performed as weakly at the box office as it did: CinemaBlend surmises that it existed in a no-man’s land, with people above 30 not ‘getting’ it, but people too far below 30 not ‘getting’ the retro gaming references either; it being a geek movie that most geeks don’t actually relate to (“This is a movie about a slacker musician whose biggest problem is choosing which of the two hot girls he’s dating he most wants to sleep with”); and, lastly, the ‘everyone hates Michael Cera’ hypothesis, which I don’t entirely buy, but which is widespread enough that it has to be based on some reality.
In some respects, it doesn’t matter why; what matters is the aftermath. Hollywood’s backlash against ‘geek’ properties without a hit-you-over-the-head mainstream hook could be just as bad as we fear.
Read on...








Turns out the early 


Eric Limer
James Plafke
Max
This is What Ramen Looks Like Inside Your Body
How To Make Rage Faces on Facebook Chat
How to Make Google Translate Beatbox
Notch Offers to Fund Psychonauts 2 After Tim Schafer Reveals No One Wanted To
How to Make Your Facebook Cover Look Extra Awesome






RSS