comScore
Uncategorized Tuesday, April 17th 2012 at 12:39 pm

The Tupac Hologram and Our Fascination With Resurrection

Closing out this year’s Coachella festival was a surprise performance by none other than a hologram of Tupac Shakur, a pairing of concepts I think most people had never imagined prior to yesterday. The rapper’s appearance was shocking not only because of the holography, but because Shakur was famously murdered in 1996.

According to MTV, The Tupac Hologram was the brainchild of Dr. Dre, who also performed at the festival. However, it was Nick Smith and his company AV Concepts that put the hologram on the stage. The CG rendering of the dead rapper (complete with superhuman abs) was created by the special effects company Digital Domain.

The performance is believed to have been created thanks to an optical illusion aptly called “Pepper’s Ghost,” where a projected image is bounced onto a thin, nearly invisible Mylar screen angled over the stage. AV Concepts used a similar technique during the 2006 Grammy awards, and allowed Madonna to dance with the animated band Gorillaz. (For those interested, a breakdown of how the trick works can be seen here.)

The Tupac Hologram put on an eerie performance. When it appeared, the crowd became noticeably quiet while the show continued, so achingly aware of its strangeness. The CG simulacrum even declared “I’m a ghost” during a rendition of “Hail Mary.” The ghostly, semi-transparent image went on to do two more numbers – one opposite a likely perturbed Snoop Dogg – before, no kidding, dissolving into triangles in a blaze of otherworldly light.

While I must confess ignorance to the life and body of work of Tupac, the resurrection obsession is part and parcel of the music industry. We can get specific: Back in 1995, the surviving Beatles recorded two new tracks along with unreleased demos recorded by John Lennon in 1977. Lennon had been dead since 1980. For his 75th birthday in 2010, Elvis Presley netted $60 million despite having been dead since 1977. Deceased in 2004, Ol’ Dirty Bastard still managed to appear on 2009′s “Blackroc,” a rap album put together by the Black Keys.

Though resurrections are a phenomenon that is particularly common in the music industry, it’s notable that CG recreations of dead actors haven’t broken into mainstream film. Perhaps it’s because fooling the ear is easier than fooling the eye.

Posthumous musical careers are clearly not unique to Tupac, but Shakur’s has been particularly lively. Since his death, seven albums have been released under the rapper’s name. For Forbes’ 2002 edition of the magazine’s annual list of top-earning dead celebrities, Shakur came in at number ten. A 2003 documentary about Shakur’s life, titled Tupac: Resurrection, was narrated entirely by Shakur. From 1997 on, Shakur has made 49 guest “appearances” on the tracks of other recording artists.

All of this is not to mention the rumors held by some ardent fans that Shakur is, in fact, still alive and in hiding somewhere. With all that in mind, it’s not really a question of why the Tupac Hologram exists, but why it has taken so long.

Despite the seeming inevitability of the Tupac Hologram, there is something particularly disturbing about it. True, these kind of hologram performances are inherently weird. However, there is a big difference between watching the entirely fictional Gorillaz and the recreation of a dead man, especially when that dead man performed a song with a living, breathing man (Snoop). The creators of the spectacle even created new audio for the performance – unless Tupac was prone to shouting “Coachella!” during his life.

Beyond that, the Tupac Hologram is most distressing as it’s an entertainer completely stripped of its humanity. When a singer is on stage,  he or she is mostly their celebrity, with their humanity tucked safely away for later. At home, they are someone else, but on stage they fill a role assigned to them by their fans and perhaps by themselves. Some take it to an extreme – Ozzy bit the head off a bat. For others, it’s subtle – Roy Orbison’s dark glasses, for instance.

Unlike them, the Tupac Hologram has no humanity; it is only celebrity. The Tupac Hologram will not go home and read Shakespeare, as Shakur did. The Tupac Hologram will not make controversial political statements. The Tupac Hologram will not visit Tupac’s mother, Afeni Shakur Davis. The Tupac Hologram is empty, and we made it.

Once you’re dead, your past is fixed and frozen. After they’re safely entombed, the dead are polished and prepared for posterity; reshaped and remade by fans and loved ones into legends. When we bring them back, with unreleased tracks and holograms, they look better than ever (seriously, those CG abs) and sound like never before.

Perhaps we do it because we want to believe that its a trick we can pull off on ourselves. That we can be immortalized, loved, and rewarded long after our best days our behind us. That we can be young and vibrant again – what’s a few bullets to a dancing hologram?

When we look into the Tupac Hologram, we see ourselves reflected brightly on a thin Mylar screen.

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • Dr Coene

    I agree with most of the sentiment in this article, save a single point. The trick we are attempting to pull on ourselves, I believe, is not to caste ourselves in adored immortality, but to immortalize someone we’ve adored. Chronic cynicism is flaccid and lazy. This is not about ourselves. This is about missing someone.

  • Dr Coene

    For the crowd, at least.

    For the music industry, this is about money.

  • Max Eddy

    I worried that the “what you see is yourself reflected!” trope might sound a bit weak and tired, but it’s the honest conclusion I came to.

    That said, I do think the sense of loss is definitely a component here.

  • togo

    miku does that everyday :P

  • Anonymous

    I hope Nirvana does a Kurt Ghost show!

  • Anonymous

    I think for someone to write an article on something like this… They should have been a fan of Tupac’s music. What I saw was something incredible from a technological standpoint, and I have to be honest… You can make a hologram of a  LIVING artist, and there’s a good chance I’d pay to see it. Crazy tech like that, mixed with music I like, is something I invite.

    Sure the hologram wasn’t 100% perfect… But damn if it weren’t 95%. I don’t know why one would find issue with it, not having an interest in said artist, unless you just needed something to write about though.

  • Anonymous

    I think this is the best article I’ve yet read about this.

  • Dr Coene

    I imagine you’re likely right to a degree as well. It wasn’t so much that I squeamed from a trope, but rather that the overwhelming sense I got was just the simple sadness of missing someone. The silliness and futility by which we cope with loss has yet to reach any sort of limit.

  • Dr Coene

    I don’t think anyone needs to be a fully versed fan in order to write about an event like this. Sure, being a fan may add insight, but it may also completely ruin any chance at an even headed, objective analysis. We all know how fanboys can be.

  • Dr Coene

     Agreed. By far.

  • Anonymous

    Knowing Pac’s look, movements, and enjoying his music would definitely give you a different perspective on what happened on that stage. First and foremost I am blown away by the tech. This wasn’t some J-Pop act, or a Gorillaz act. This was recreating the movements of a real person very accurately, given the circumstance.

    You don’t have to be a “fully versed fan”, as I’m not exactly a Pac historian… But if you have no interest in the man or his music then your perspective on how awesome seeing something like that can be, is likely askew.

    I’m no huge fan of The Beatles, by any means. I might enjoy a song here or there if it happens to come on the radio (dated reference aside), but if I saw Paul McCartney playing alongside a hologram John Lennon that looked pretty damn close to 100% accurate, my jaw would drop and I would watch the whole damn thing in amazement.

    I feel like a lot of people writing about why this “performance” was somehow “wrong” or “awkward” aren’t taking into account the emotion some people would have, seeing Holo-Pac do a show for them.

    I understand what you’re saying and appreciate it, but I feel like if this were a deceased member of a band that the writer enjoyed, the article could potentially be 100% in the other direction.

    I should mention that I agree 100% with your first post. Didn’t notice you were the same person.

  • Firebox6

    I guess this is the next evolutionary step from Nat King Cole and Natalie Cole dueting…

  • http://twitter.com/jeffrohoward Jeff Howard

    Great article. Speaks a lot to our obsession with celebrities.

  • Culporter_jd

    TThis is witchcraft! Simply said simply put.

  • Missy Leigh

    Art is always leaps ahead of science when it comes to our search for meaning in life because art is an expression of humanity. Death drives life. The music industry may be credited for this but we created it…. collective consciousness. I know I’m not the only one who sees where this is headed.