comScore
Uncategorized Friday, September 21st 2012 at 9:40 am

Verizon CFO Basically Calls “That Whole Unlimited Thing” a Fad

Mobile phone carriers have long flirted with unlimited data plans — offering them and then not — in order to trick convince customers to come to their side of the fence. This is nothing new, as both AT&T and Verizon have played this game before, but what is honestly the tiniest bit shocking is how these companies seem to think that unlimited plans aren’t the future of their industry. Speaking at the Goldman Sachs Communacopia Conference yesterday, Fran Shammo, Verizon’s CFO, said “that whole unlimited thing,” in his opinion, “is going by the wayside.”

This kind of statement is mighty confusing, even in context. Here’s the full paragraph where Shammo lets this nugget slip, with the important bit in bold:

So what customers are understanding and through our good sales routine is once you explain to a customer their usage on a monthly basis, unlimited is just a word, it doesn’t really mean anything and that people don’t really — I think a lot of consumers think they consume a lot more data than they really do. So that whole unlimited thing I think is going by the wayside and they see the benefit of going to the shared.

So, Shammo’s saying that folks are switching to Verizon’s new shared plan because they’ve come to realize it’s better for them. In reality, if an unlimited data plan customer wants to upgrade their current phone, say to the iPhone 5, but doesn’t want to pay sticker price, they are required to switch to the shared data plan. There are surely those on the unlimited plan that made the call to switch based on their usage, but Shammo’s assertion misrepresents the facts. It’s more coercion than persuasion.

There’s also the little fact that the amount of streaming is only set to increase, thus meaning more data. Something tells us that unlimited plans will only become more desirable as time goes on. Whatever you say, though, Verizon.

(Verizon via CNET News)

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • Jack Bond

    Agreed. If overage rates don’t go down, I’d rather pay a little extra for unlimited.

  • http://twitter.com/pounddollarsign Michael Corey

    I switched to Sprint back in March because at the time they were the only ones who offered an unlimited plan. The sales woman I dealt with agreed that the vast majority of her new customers came over for that reason. She said it was a more popular reason to switch than the fact that Sprint just started to offer the iPhone.

    Who knows how much of that was true and how much was her trying to make me feel good about my purchase, but bottom line is I’d never sign up for a plan that didn’t have unlimited data.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Shockmonk3y Andrew Rust

    So.. my 32+ GB/month usage is a lot more than I am really using? Sheesh… why that makes me a lot more comfortable to know. I guess I’m all ready to switch over from $30 / month on a legally agreed to contract for the new “Fad” and pay only $450/month. Yep.. Sounds like Sham-Wow is right on.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1745027821 Jeremy Pennini

    My “unlimited” plan starts being “optimized” after 2GB. I’d rather pay for a 3GB plan, then have a fake unlimited plan.

  • Fake Name

    “going by the wayside”… whatever, pal. That’s why people are switching to sprint and boost mobile in waves.

  • http://www.facebook.com/troyldailey Troy Dailey

    I was going to go to Verizon…but then I had a thought. So I didn’t, because I don’t want to pay $500US to listen to Pandora or RadioParadise at the gym every night and listen to a netflix doc. on the walk home. Sprint is a pain in the ass, but I won’t drop it until they drop unlimited.