comScore
Space Tuesday, November 20th 2012 at 5:10 pm

What Did NASA Find on Mars That Has Them So Excited?

Have you ever had to keep a secret that you really, really wanted to share, but you couldn’t because the timing wasn’t right? That seems like the position NASA is in right now. After a whirlwind first couple of months on the surface of the Red Planet, the rover Curiosity has been silent, idling for sometime. Analysts Earth-side are poring over data from a series of five sand samples recently analyzed in the rover’s mobile chemistry lab, the Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) unit. There’s no word on what they’ve found quite yet, but researchers are willing to say that it’s something big. Like, historical event big. Considering Curiosity’s mission is to find life on Mars, there’s pretty much just one thing that could be considered historically big news from the rover — signs of life on Mars. Not that anyone is saying that right now — but sometimes, the way in which you don’t say something could speak more than what you do say, and this certainly feels like one of those times.

Intriguing chemical and geological analysis, there’s one reason that Curiosity was launched — to search for signs of life on Mars. Anything else, no matter how cool, has to feel like a half-measure. So historically big news here means, pretty much by definition, signs of life on the now dead planet. Which we probably don’t have to tell you, would be huge. It’s also an announcement you really want to be sure you’re right on if you make it, so don’t expect confirmation of what is currently the best kind of rumor and innuendo — the kind about life in outer space. Speaking as a former PR wonk, that’s not the sort of announcement you want to have to walk back.

While having to keep quiet about news as exciting as finding signs of life on Mars has to be frustrating, it’s nothing compared to how crappy it would feel to make an announcement that there was once life on Mars and then have to backtrack later. That would really, really suck, not to mention dealing a major setback to the space agency’s credibility. So whatever this data ends up suggesting, you can be sure of one thing — if NASA ever does make the announcement that they’ve discovered life on Mars, they’re not going to do so until the data they’re basing that conclusion on is damn near unimpeachable.

That’s likely to make for an annoyingly long gap between getting excited about the discovery and feeling confident enough to release the data to the public. The wheels of progress turn slowly — sometimes too slowly for our comfort — but turn they do. We hope you’ll stay tuned in here, because the one other thing we can guarantee is that whatever NASA has figured out up there, we’ll be bringing it to you the very second we’re able.

(via NPR)

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • Raimo Kangasniemi

    Curiosity’s job is not to find life. That’s the job for the long-delayed ExoMars rover. Curiosity’s job is to create a picture of the past geological history of Mars, among other things. It can’t directly find life.

  • Boggles

    True, and well said – but the author is correct in in that having said: ”one for the history books” anything less than some evidence of past life or existing life – (through presumably some organic chemcial signature) is going to be a cop out. They are smart guys these NASA chaps, they would know this.

  • http://profiles.google.com/msouth Mike South

    “the now dead planet”. That seems naively presumptuous.

  • Idlethoughts

    We probably should and would have seen signs of it, if any conventional form of life still existed on mars.

  • Idlethoughts

    Sure it can, it just wasn’t what it was built with the explicit intent on finding. Finding life is still finding life regardless of who does it.

  • Raimo Kangasniemi

    Getting a definitive result is just much harder with Curiosity.

  • Raimo Kangasniemi

    No, if they are under the surface – nothing could survive on the surface – where there could be environments that could support very simple forms of lives.

  • Crazy

    “We hope you’ll stay tuned in here, because the one other thing we can guarantee is that whatever NASA has figured out up there, we’ll be bringing it to you the very second we’re able.”

    /WATCHING INTENSELY!!!

  • Idlethoughts

    Feasible but what would be the organism’s/ecosystem’s energy source? And even then do we have any reason to believe such environments do or are likely to exist?
    Mars may not be definitively dead but it’s neither naive nor particularly presumptuous to call it such.

  • Idlethoughts

    But you have to admit even debatable results would certainly help get public and possibly financial support for the ExoMars rover. And who knows we might have just gotten a really good sample.

  • Maxamoto

    Oh wow, yet another rocket scientist here to share his vast knowledge and experience with the rest of the world.

  • bupu

    They found a sea shell.

  • Raimo Kangasniemi

    Just a fan of astronomy and space overall. ;)

  • Raimo Kangasniemi

    NASA has already poured cold water over this, so whatever they’ve got must be at most just a one piece in a puzzle of finding or disproving past or current life on Mars.

  • Raimo Kangasniemi

    We have reasons to suspect. Comparison between Phoenix’ landing area and Antarctica brings up the possibility that hardy microbes that survive on the Dry Valleys of Antarctica might be able to possible to survive – but not thrive – just below the surface where the might be occasional thin films of water. Deeper underground there are places where a possibility of larger amounts of liquid water exists, like at the bottom of the northern polar cap based on radar. There’s evidence of cave systems – former lava tubes, for example – on Mars, and those might offer refuges for life.

  • http://www.facebook.com/marius.evangelista Marius DePano Evangelista

    Look up the Gilbert Levin experiment from the 1976 Viking mission. Life on Mars was found 36 years ago!

  • Richard Martin

    Maybe they have found a canyon filled with pens. this must be where they go when they slip from my desk and through that parallel dimension by my feet because i certainly can’t find them once the inevitable happens.

  • Idlethoughts

    Oh, well that’s pretty cool. I would still put my money on Europa, but it’s good to know mars has a decent chance at housing life as well.

  • Idlethoughts

    In that case, cheers to an exiting future.

  • nat

    Mitts tax return

  • DrunkenWolf

    maybe they find my car?!

  • Dutch

    They found a Roman coin

  • Johnathan

    Maybe they found a prothean artifact :)

  • http://profiles.google.com/macca007 Shane Mc Grath

    A black rectangle, And Nasa have been told to stay away from Europa. o.O

  • Wolfsong

    Actual, pooling, liquid water. Guaranteed.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1472169958 David Guhin

    They found oil and now they need to figure out how to build the pipeline.

  • Gamgoose

    Perhaps they discovered a new element?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3E5Y3BSA4IYQ7YHWHNPA7LRU4U dr_bugsy

    It has a camera. If life is big enough to see.

  • http://www.facebook.com/michaeldavidbeckman Michael Beckman

    I hope you aren’t serious.

  • Emiliano Corte

    Maybe they found a girafe!

  • Emiliano Corte

    Or a fish! Or a zebra! Or perhaps my ten-dollar bill!

  • http://www.facebook.com/NelsonOKC Nelson Atwell

    Maybe they found a fetus. Oh wait. That isn’t life…at least in America.

  • stoney1187

    they found the T virus

  • Hayden Wade

    That’s because a fetus isn’t a life it’s a cluster of living cells.

  • al.k

    they probably found something that will depopulate earth when they bring it back to earth, that’s seems to be their agenda hasn’t it??

  • http://twitter.com/Cornerss william

    maybe they will say earth and mars were once one or collided in the past

  • http://twitter.com/grimcity Neal Boyd

    Even if they found a baby it wouldn’t fare too well in Mars environment.

  • Anonymous

    Life?

    Nope. Bigger.

    They found my frikkin’ car keys.

  • Anonymous

    Or socks.

  • theclevercat

    They found Unobtanium. The delay is caused by getting Giovani Ribisi ready for a trip.

  • MyThoughts

    I think is a big waste of tax payers money if you ask me. Just an excuse to fund more missions. Either cough up evidence or pack it all in.

  • Anonymous

    If you don’t look you won’t see.

  • http://twitter.com/Toolatekev1 Thomas Hill

    The answer is: A great idea for a publicity stunt that will get people interested in NASA.

  • Richard Gerst

    Your point? I’d make this comment about how unethical that comment was, or even how hard it is to read a run-on sentence, but I’m going to comment on how your statement is contradictory.
    I’ll assume you meant “…isn’t alive. It’s a…”. Organisms as small as prokaryotic bacteria, which are similar to what NASA would be looking for, are considered living, and, thus, “alive”. Bacteria are unicellular. An adult human, which has trillions of cells, is also considered “alive”. If a prokaryotic unicellular bacterium is “alive”, and a eukaryotic multicellular adult human is “alive”, then how is a cluster of living, functioning eukaryotic cells any less alive than the prokaryotic bacterium?

  • James

    Snot?

  • Nelson sucks

    What does abortion have to do with anything? Nelson you need to shut your old trap, CUZ you sound like a nut job. Stop worrying about other peoples problems and worry about your own!

  • MyThoughtsAreNoneBecauseImDumb

    Why don’t you look up all the useful things Nasa does for this country. MORON.