comScore
Uncategorized Thursday, February 23rd 2012 at 1:15 pm

Study Shows Throttling Unlimited Data Plans Doesn’t Really Affect Network Bandwidth

AT&T has caught a lot of flak recently for throttling unlimited data plans down to practically unusable speeds. AT&T stopped offering unlimited data plans a while ago, the only remaining users with unlimited plans being those who were fortunate enough to be grandfathered in. AT&T asserted that the throttling is to keep their network from being overtaxed, but many users feel more like AT&T is just trying to shove them over to a tiered plan. A new study by Validas, a wireless bill analysis firm, sides with the users showing that data usage on unlimited plans is comparable — almost identical — to usage on unlimited plans.

Validas took a bunch of data from 55,000 cell phone bills, AT&T and Verizon users alike, from 2011, before all this unlimited data throttling stuff really started. What the numbers show is that there’s really no huge difference in behavior between users with unlimited plans and users with tiered plans, even among customers with data usage in the top %5, this study’s focus.

Validas put it this way in their report:

“When we look at the top 5% of data users, there is virtually no difference in data consumption between those on unlimited and those on tiered plans—and yet the unlimited consumers are the ones at risk of getting their service turned off. So it’s curious that anyone would think the throttling here represents a serious effort at alleviating network bandwidth issues. After all, Sprint does seemingly fine maintaining non-throttled unlimited data for its customers.”

Now AT&T definitely isn’t the only one out there throttling data speeds, but they’re probably being the most agressive about it, often throttling after only 2gb of usage. For reference, T-Mobile throttles after 5gb, and Verizon throttles its very top 5%. All in all, what this study shows is that network stress probably has very little, if anything, to do with data throttling. Instead, it’s likely a business move to transfer customers to tiered data plans where overages become a possibility. And if you think that sounds suspicious, or even far out, ask yourself this: how long have you been paying in order to send text messages?

(via BGR)

Relevant to your interests

Filed Under |
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Robbie-Meisler/502439616 Robbie Meisler

    “showing that data usage on unlimited plans is comparable — almost identical — to usage on unlimited plans.”
    I think you mean on tiered plans.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2HB7EBPJTDHXYC5CJ5B6HJOBGE stillplayingpsolol

    Corporate was wrong and tried to “overbook” by stamping “unlimited data” with 3 and 4g coverage. They didn’t want to expand with their user-base so they are punishing their users. I pay $50/mo. for 36mbps internet for my PC and I don’t get throttled, only interference from other wireless networks. If I paid $100/mo. for an unlimited plan at 4G (I think that’s like 12mbps?) then I expect constant 12mbps allocated to me for a full month. If that’s not the case, then remove “unlimited” with “steady” 12mbps then throttled after 2gb. I guess that wouldn’t look nice on advertisements though.

    The States is too big with too little population to properly support this tech on a grand-scale. It works great in places like in Japan where they have a population of over 120 million within a nation about the size of California.

  • hmmphff!! :S

    The Corporations are only showing their greed!

  • Jesusbrandmayonaise

    Something we all already knew now in the face of hard data it just reaffirms our suspicions but the real kicker is people will still buy into their crap.